Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 3, 2026

Olfactory Context Dependent Memory: Direct Presentation of Odorants
Published on: September 18, 2018
Retrieval-induced versus context-induced forgetting: Does retrieval-induced forgetting depend on context shifts?
Julia S Soares1, Cody W Polack2, Ralph R Miller2
1Department of Psychology, University of California Santa Cruz.
Retrieval-induced forgetting (RIF) occurs when recalling information makes related details harder to remember. This study found RIF persists even when study and retrieval contexts are similar, challenging context-shift theories.
Area of Science:
- Cognitive Psychology
- Memory Research
- Forgetting Mechanisms
Background:
- Retrieval-induced forgetting (RIF) is a memory phenomenon where retrieving target information impairs recall of related nontarget information.
- Existing theories, such as the context-shift account, propose specific conditions under which RIF occurs, relating it to shifts in environmental or mental context between study, retrieval, and testing phases.
Purpose of the Study:
- To empirically test the predictions of the context-shift account of retrieval-induced forgetting.
- To investigate whether manipulating context shifts between study and retrieval practice phases influences the magnitude of RIF.
- To examine the role of context differences across study, retrieval, and test phases in RIF.
Main Methods:
- Two experiments were conducted to manipulate context similarity between study and retrieval phases.
- Experiment 1 used a generative study condition, creating high similarity between study materials and retrieval practice.
- Experiment 2 replicated findings and further explored the impact of context variations across all three memory phases.
Main Results:
- No degradation of RIF was observed when the context shift between study and retrieval practice was minimized.
- Findings were contrary to the predictions of the context-shift account, suggesting context shifts are not the sole drivers of RIF.
- RIF was consistently observed following generative study, supporting its robustness across different study conditions.
Conclusions:
- The results challenge the context-shift account as the primary explanation for retrieval-induced forgetting.
- The observed pattern of results is more consistent with inhibitory accounts of memory, such as those proposing active suppression of nontarget information during retrieval.
- The study provides robust evidence against context-based explanations and supports interference-based mechanisms in memory retrieval and forgetting.
More Related Videos
07:59Using Practice Testing, Public Speaking, and Source Monitoring to Examine the Influences of Learning Strategies and Stress on Episodic Memory
Published on: June 14, 2019
08:05A Prediction Error-driven Retrieval Procedure for Destabilizing and Rewriting Maladaptive Reward Memories in Hazardous Drinkers
Published on: January 5, 2018
Related Concept Videos
Interference and Decay
Interference occurs when competing memories hinder the retrieval of particular information. It can be classified into two types: proactive and retroactive interference. Proactive...
Forgetting
Encoding...
Retrieval
Recall involves accessing information without cues, such as during an essay test, where individuals must retrieve facts and concepts from memory unaided. Another example is remembering the name of a colleague...
Implicit Memories
One key aspect of implicit...
Higher Mental Functions of Brain: Learning and Memory
Serial Position Effect