Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Counterfactual Thinking01:19

Counterfactual Thinking

379
Counterfactual thinking is a cognitive process wherein individuals mentally reconstruct alternative versions of past events, often beginning with “what if” or “if only.” This reflective mechanism plays a significant role in shaping emotional experiences and guiding future behavior. Though typically triggered by unfavorable or unexpected outcomes, counterfactual thinking can also emerge in mundane, everyday decisions and experiences, revealing its deep entrenchment in...
379
Hindsight Biases01:12

Hindsight Biases

4.5K
Hindsight bias leads you to believe that the event you just experienced was predictable, even though it really wasn’t. In other words, you knew all along that things would turn out the way they did. Can you relate this to the phrase "Hindsight is 20/20" now? 
4.5K
Magical Thinking01:29

Magical Thinking

299
Magical thinking encompasses the belief in assumptions that defy logical reasoning yet appear intuitively convincing. It is a common psychological phenomenon that persists across various cultural and individual contexts. While these assumptions contradict empirical evidence and scientific laws, they often serve meaningful psychological roles in promoting emotional resilience and a sense of control, especially under stress or uncertainty.Thought-Action Fusion and the Law of SimilarityA key...
299
Beck's Cognitive Therapy01:25

Beck's Cognitive Therapy

546
Cognitive therapy is a psychological approach designed to address distortions in thinking, which can lead to negative emotions and unrealistic beliefs. These cognitive distortions often influence how individuals interpret and respond to situations, exacerbating emotional distress. Below are some prevalent cognitive distortions, their characteristics, and examples of how they manifest in thought processes.
Arbitrary Inference
Arbitrary inference involves making conclusions without sufficient...
546
False Memories01:18

False Memories

648
False memories represent a cognitive distortion in which individuals recall events that did not happen, or remember them in an altered form. This phenomenon highlights the brain's constructive nature in processing and recalling memories, emphasizing that memory is not a perfect representation of past events but rather a dynamic reconstruction influenced by various factors.
One primary source of false memories is misattribution, where individuals incorrectly associate external information...
648
Reason and Intuition01:37

Reason and Intuition

7.7K
The human brain processes information for decision-making using one of two routes: an intuitive system and a rational system (Epstein, 1994; popularized by Kahneman, 2011 as System 1 and System 2, respectively). The intuitive system is quick, impulsive, and operates with minimal effort, relying on emotions or habits to provide cues for what to do next, while the rational system is logical, analytical, deliberate, and methodical. Research in neuropsychology suggests that the...
7.7K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Inference and Imagination.

Topics in cognitive science·2026
Same author

Introduction to Progress and Puzzles of Cognitive Science: Introduction to a Wiley Virtual Issue.

Cognitive science·2024
Same author

How people think about the truth of hypothetical impossibilities.

Memory & cognition·2023
Same author

Human verifications: Computable with truth values outside logic.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2023
Same author

How people reason with counterfactual and causal explanations for Artificial Intelligence decisions in familiar and unfamiliar domains.

Memory & cognition·2023
Same author

Cognitive processes in imaginative moral shifts: How judgments of morally unacceptable actions change.

Memory & cognition·2022
Same journal

Implicit Bias: Evolution of a Powerful Idea.

Annual review of psychology·2026
Same journal

Introduction.

Annual review of psychology·2026
Same journal

Social Robotics Is Not (Just) About Machines, It Is About People: Psychology's Role in Developing Social Machines.

Annual review of psychology·2025
Same journal

Intensive Longitudinal Methods: Toward a Psychological Science of Daily Life.

Annual review of psychology·2025
Same journal

Human Rationality.

Annual review of psychology·2025
Same journal

Space to Act, Think, and Create.

Annual review of psychology·2025
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Apr 3, 2026

Design and Implementation of an fMRI Study Examining Thought Suppression in Young Women with, and At-risk, for Depression
08:42

Design and Implementation of an fMRI Study Examining Thought Suppression in Young Women with, and At-risk, for Depression

Published on: May 19, 2015

11.3K

Counterfactual Thought.

Ruth M J Byrne1

  • 1School of Psychology and Institute of Neuroscience, Trinity College Dublin, University of Dublin, Ireland;

Annual Review of Psychology
|September 23, 2015
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

People naturally imagine alternative pasts ("what ifs") to explain events, plan future actions, and make decisions. This cognitive ability, crucial for reasoning and emotional regulation, develops in childhood and is linked to prefrontal cortex function.

Keywords:
blamedecision-makingimaginationmoral judgmentreasoningregret

More Related Videos

Task Interruption and Resumption Paradigm for Testing the Activation and Pursuit of an Abstract Thinking Goal
06:45

Task Interruption and Resumption Paradigm for Testing the Activation and Pursuit of an Abstract Thinking Goal

Published on: April 18, 2017

6.7K
The Adventures of Fundi Intervention Based on the Cognitive and Emotional Processing in Attention Deficit Hyperactive Disorder Patients
05:48

The Adventures of Fundi Intervention Based on the Cognitive and Emotional Processing in Attention Deficit Hyperactive Disorder Patients

Published on: June 12, 2020

6.6K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Apr 3, 2026

Design and Implementation of an fMRI Study Examining Thought Suppression in Young Women with, and At-risk, for Depression
08:42

Design and Implementation of an fMRI Study Examining Thought Suppression in Young Women with, and At-risk, for Depression

Published on: May 19, 2015

11.3K
Task Interruption and Resumption Paradigm for Testing the Activation and Pursuit of an Abstract Thinking Goal
06:45

Task Interruption and Resumption Paradigm for Testing the Activation and Pursuit of an Abstract Thinking Goal

Published on: April 18, 2017

6.7K
The Adventures of Fundi Intervention Based on the Cognitive and Emotional Processing in Attention Deficit Hyperactive Disorder Patients
05:48

The Adventures of Fundi Intervention Based on the Cognitive and Emotional Processing in Attention Deficit Hyperactive Disorder Patients

Published on: June 12, 2020

6.6K

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Neuroscience

Background:

  • Humans spontaneously generate counterfactual thoughts, imagining how reality could differ.
  • These thoughts serve multiple cognitive functions, including explanation, future preparation, and decision-making.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To explore the cognitive processes underlying counterfactual thinking.
  • To understand the functions and developmental trajectory of counterfactuals.
  • To examine the neural basis and knowledge modulation of counterfactual imagination.

Main Methods:

  • Analysis of cognitive processes involved in mutating and comparing mental representations.
  • Examination of the developmental course of counterfactual abilities in childhood.
  • Review of the impact of prefrontal cortex function on counterfactual generation.
  • Investigation of semantic and pragmatic influences on counterfactual plausibility.

Main Results:

  • Counterfactuals are computed by mutating reality representations and comparing alternatives.
  • This ability develops through childhood, aiding in understanding others' beliefs.
  • Prefrontal cortex integrity is vital for counterfactual imagination.
  • Knowledge influences the plausibility of imagined alternatives.

Conclusions:

  • Counterfactual thinking is a fundamental cognitive process with broad implications.
  • Its development and neural underpinnings are critical for complex cognition.
  • Understanding counterfactuals enhances insights into decision-making, emotion, and social cognition.