Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

How Multi-Tasking Ability Impacts Performance, Workload, Situation Awareness, Stress and Trust with Simulated Imperfect Automation.

Human factors·2026
Same author

Camouflage Using Surface Disruption: The Importance of Corners Versus Edges.

Ecology and evolution·2025
Same author

The benefits of automation transparency are dependent on human attention control capacity.

Applied ergonomics·2025
Same author

Adaptable Automation Transparency: Should Humans Be Provided Flexibility to Self-Select Transparency Information?

Human factors·2025
Same author

Repeated application of bifocal transcranial alternating current stimulation improves network connectivity but not response inhibition: a double-blind sham control study.

Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991)·2025
Same author

The Impact of Lower Degree Automation Reliability on Higher Degree Automation Failure Detection in Simulated Air Traffic Control.

Human factors·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Apr 3, 2026

Three-Dimensional Shape Modeling and Analysis of Brain Structures
05:33

Three-Dimensional Shape Modeling and Analysis of Brain Structures

Published on: November 14, 2019

7.7K

Global shape processing: A behavioral and electrophysiological analysis of both contour and texture processing.

Vanessa K Bowden, J Edwin Dickinson, Allison M Fox

    Journal of Vision
    |September 25, 2015
    PubMed
    Summary

    The angle between corners, not just their number, is crucial for shape discrimination. This study used event-related potentials to identify neural activity in the brain

    More Related Videos

    Combined Invasive Subcortical and Non-invasive Surface Neurophysiological Recordings for the Assessment of Cognitive and Emotional Functions in Humans
    08:25

    Combined Invasive Subcortical and Non-invasive Surface Neurophysiological Recordings for the Assessment of Cognitive and Emotional Functions in Humans

    Published on: May 19, 2016

    11.4K
    Cortical Source Analysis of High-Density EEG Recordings in Children
    09:32

    Cortical Source Analysis of High-Density EEG Recordings in Children

    Published on: June 30, 2014

    22.1K

    Related Experiment Videos

    Last Updated: Apr 3, 2026

    Three-Dimensional Shape Modeling and Analysis of Brain Structures
    05:33

    Three-Dimensional Shape Modeling and Analysis of Brain Structures

    Published on: November 14, 2019

    7.7K
    Combined Invasive Subcortical and Non-invasive Surface Neurophysiological Recordings for the Assessment of Cognitive and Emotional Functions in Humans
    08:25

    Combined Invasive Subcortical and Non-invasive Surface Neurophysiological Recordings for the Assessment of Cognitive and Emotional Functions in Humans

    Published on: May 19, 2016

    11.4K
    Cortical Source Analysis of High-Density EEG Recordings in Children
    09:32

    Cortical Source Analysis of High-Density EEG Recordings in Children

    Published on: June 30, 2014

    22.1K

    Area of Science:

    • Cognitive Neuroscience
    • Visual Perception
    • Neuroscience

    Background:

    • Shape discrimination is vital for visual processing.
    • Corners on contours are hypothesized to be critical features for shape detection.
    • Understanding the neural basis of shape processing is essential.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To investigate the role of corner number versus corner angle in shape discrimination.
    • To determine the temporal dynamics and brain regions involved in processing corner-based shape information.
    • To explore the neural substrates of global shape processing using electrophysiological measures.

    Main Methods:

    • Event-related potentials (ERPs) were recorded during shape discrimination tasks.
    • Participants discriminated between radial frequency (RF) patterns varying in corner arrangement.
    • Source localization techniques were applied to identify neural generators of ERP components.

    Main Results:

    • The angle between corners significantly influenced discrimination performance more than the number of corners.
    • A posterior negativity (N220) was sensitive to curvature variations, indicating sensitivity to corner presence.
    • Source localization identified cortical area V4 as a neural substrate for processing these features.

    Conclusions:

    • Corner angle is a more critical feature than corner number for shape discrimination.
    • The posterior N220 component reflects sensitivity to contour curvature and corner information.
    • Cortical area V4 plays a role in processing shape-defining features like corners, detectable via electrophysiology.