Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 1, 2026

Irrelevant Stimuli and Action Control: Analyzing the Influence of Ignored Stimuli via the Distractor-Response Binding Paradigm
Published on: May 14, 2014
How Distractor Objects Trigger Referential Overspecification: Testing the Effects of Visual Clutter and Distractor
Ruud Koolen1, Emiel Krahmer2, Marc Swerts2
1Tilburg Center for Cognition and Communication (TiCC), School of Humanities, Tilburg University. r.m.f.koolen@uvt.nl.
Abstract:
In two experiments, we investigate to what extent various visual saliency cues in realistic visual scenes cause speakers to overspecify their definite object descriptions with a redundant color attribute. The results of the first experiment demonstrate that speakers are more likely to redundantly mention color when visual clutter is present in a scene as compared to when this is not the case. In the second experiment, we found that distractor type and distractor color affect redundant color use: Speakers are most likely to overspecify if there is at least one distractor object present that has the same type, but a different color than the target referent. Reliable effects of distractor distance were not found. Taken together, our results suggest that certain visual saliency cues guide speakers in determining which objects in a visual scene are relevant distractors, and which not. We argue that this is problematic for algorithms that aim to generate human-like descriptions of objects (such as the Incremental Algorithm), since these generally select properties that help to distinguish a target from all objects that are present in a scene.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
The Anchoring-and-Adjustment Heuristic
Framing Effects
Causes of Similarity-Dissimilarity Effect
Self-Discrepancy Theory
Theory of Attribution I: Correspondent Inference Theory
Schemas

