Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 30, 2026

06:05
The Participant-Reported Implementation Update and Score PRIUS: A Novel Method for Capturing Implementation-Related Data Over Time
Published on: February 19, 2021
1.8K
Using the IRB Researcher Assessment Tool to Guide Quality Improvement
Daniel E Hall1, Barbara H Hanusa2, Bruce S Ling2
1VA Pittsburgh Healthcare System, PA, USA University of Pittsburgh, PA, USA hallde@upmc.edu.
Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics : JERHRE
|November 4, 2015
Summary
Institutional Review Boards (IRBs) aim to protect research participants. A new tool assesses IRB quality, identifying areas for improvement to ensure participant safety and enhance review processes.
Area of Science:
- Medical Research Ethics
- Clinical Trial Oversight
Background:
- Institutional Review Boards (IRBs) are crucial for protecting human research participants.
- A lack of standardized quality measures makes it difficult to assess IRB effectiveness.
- The IRB Researcher Assessment Tool offers a validated proxy for IRB quality.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the utility of the IRB Researcher Assessment Tool in a real-world setting.
- To identify specific IRB activities and functions requiring quality improvement.
- To propose a systematic method for analyzing and presenting IRB quality data.
Main Methods:
- Administered the IRB Researcher Assessment Tool to investigators and IRB members at a VA Medical Center.
- Utilized a previously validated, internally normed instrument assessing 45 IRB activities.
- Employed a systematic approach for data analysis and interpretation.
Main Results:
- The study successfully applied the IRB Researcher Assessment Tool to a clinical research setting.
- The analysis identified specific areas within IRB operations needing enhancement.
- A data-driven approach for pinpointing quality improvement needs was demonstrated.
Conclusions:
- The IRB Researcher Assessment Tool can effectively measure IRB quality.
- Systematic analysis of assessment data can guide targeted quality improvement initiatives.
- This approach can enhance the effectiveness of Institutional Review Boards in protecting participants.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Ethics in Research
26.2K
Today, scientists agree that good research is ethical in nature and is guided by a basic respect for human dignity and safety. However, this has not always been the case. Modern researchers must demonstrate that the research they perform is ethically sound.
26.2K
Quality Assurance
3.9K
Quality assurance is the overarching term used to describe the activities employed to ensure the proper performance of a system. These activities can be classified into three categories: quality control, quality assessment, and internal corrective measures. Typically, these activities work cyclically: quality control is performed before and during the analysis, while quality assessment occurs during and after the investigation. Internal corrective measures are implemented based on the findings...
3.9K
Blind Procedures
13.9K
Ideally, the people who observe and record the children’s behavior are unaware of who was assigned to the experimental or control group, in order to control for experimenter bias. Experimenter bias refers to the possibility that a researcher’s expectations might skew the results of the study. Remember, conducting an experiment requires a lot of planning, and the people involved in the research project have a vested interest in supporting their hypotheses. If the observers knew which...
13.9K
Cochran's Q Test
1.1K
Cochran's Q Test is a nonparametric statistical test used to determine if there are potential differences in the outcomes of three or more related groups on a binary (yes/no) or dichotomous outcome. It is essentially an extension of the McNemar Test, which is limited to two related samples - Cochran's Q test can handle three or more related samples, making it more versatile in scenarios where subjects are measured under multiple conditions. The test statistic follows a Chi-Square...
1.1K

