Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 30, 2026

06:43
Collecting Marine Gnathiid Isopod Fish Parasites with Light Traps
Published on: September 25, 2023
2.0K
Predator-induced neophobia in juvenile cichlids
Denis Meuthen1, Sebastian A Baldauf2, Theo C M Bakker2
1Institute for Evolutionary Biology and Ecology, University of Bonn, An der Immenburg 1, 53121, Bonn, Germany. dmeuthen@evolution.uni-bonn.de.
Oecologia
|November 19, 2015
Summary
Predation risk increases neophobia, prompting fish to form tighter shoals when encountering novel threats. This cross-sensory adaptation enhances antipredator strategies in prey animals.
Area of Science:
- Ethology
- Behavioral Ecology
- Neuroethology
Background:
- Prey animals exhibit plastic antipredator strategies in response to fluctuating predation risk.
- Predation risk may induce neophobia, a response to novel cues, but sensory channel specificity remains unclear.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate if predator-induced neophobia is specific to the sensory channel of the predation cue.
- To test the hypothesis that predation risk enhances responses to novel cues from different sensory modalities.
Main Methods:
- Juvenile cichlids (Pelvicachromis taeniatus) were exposed to conspecific alarm cues (predation risk) or controls from hatching.
- Shoaling behavior was assessed in response to a novel disturbance cue from a different sensory channel at 2 months of age.
Main Results:
- Fish exposed to predation risk formed more compact shoals when presented with a novel disturbance cue compared to controls.
- Experienced predation risk altered the relationship between shoal density and shoal homogeneity.
Conclusions:
- Predation risk enhances cross-sensory sensitivity to novel cues, demonstrating an effective antipredator mechanism.
- Neophobia can be modulated by prior experience with predation risk, extending beyond the initial sensory channel.
Related Concept Videos
Predator-Prey Interactions
22.2K
Predators consume prey for energy. Predators that acquire prey and prey that avoid predation both increase their chances of survival and reproduction (i.e., fitness). Routine predator-prey interactions elicit mutual adaptations that improve predator offenses, such as claws, teeth, and speed, as well as prey defenses, including crypsis, aposematism, and mimicry. Thus, predator-prey interactions resemble an evolutionary arms race.
22.2K
Fixed Action Patterns
18.1K
A fixed action pattern (FAP) is a specific, hard-wired sequence of behaviors that occurs in response to an external stimulus, called a sign stimulus. The behavior is “fixed” because it is essentially unchangeable—proceeding similarly across individuals of a species every time it occurs.
18.1K
Microbial Interactions: Predation
36
Microbial predation refers to the process by which one microorganism kills and consumes another to obtain nutrients and energy. It encompasses both bacterial and protozoan predators. This interaction plays a crucial role in shaping microbial communities and regulating nutrient cycling.Bacterial Predators: Epibiotic vs. EndobioticBacterial predators are classified based on their mode of attack as either epibiotic or endobiotic. Epibiotic predators, such as Vampirococcus, attach to the surface of...
36
Hybrid Zones
22.5K
Hybrid zones are narrow regions where two closely related species interact, mate, and produce hybrids. Relative to either parent species, hybrids may possess distinct phenotypic or genetic differences that impact their survival and reproductive success. The genetic variances introduced by hybridization influence species diversity and speciation processes within the hybrid zone.
22.5K
Parental Care
13.0K
Many animals exhibit parental care behavior, including feeding, grooming, and protecting young offspring. Parental care is universal in mammals and birds, which often have young that are born relatively helpless. Several species of insects and fish, as well as some amphibians, also care for their young.
13.0K
Instinctive Drift
1.2K
Instinctive drift refers to the tendency of animals to revert to their innate behaviors despite repeated reinforcement. Breland and Breland demonstrated this concept in an experiment with a raccoon. The raccoon was trained to pick up two coins and place them in a container in exchange for food. Initially, the raccoon learned to associate the coins with food, making them a conditioned stimulus or a substitute for food. However, over time, the raccoon became less willing to put the coins into the...
1.2K

