Comparison between Thermal Desorption Tubes and Stainless Steel Canisters Used for Measuring Volatile Organic Compounds in Petrochemical Factories
Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 30, 2026

Quantitative Detection of Trace Explosive Vapors by Programmed Temperature Desorption Gas Chromatography-Electron Capture Detector
Published on: July 25, 2014
Cheng-Ping Chang1, Tser-Cheng Lin2, Yu-Wen Lin3
11.Department of Occupational Safety and Health, Chang Jung Christian University, Tainan 71101, Taiwan; 2.Occupational Hygiene Association of Taiwan, New Taipei City 24205, Taiwan;
Objective:
The purpose of this study was to compare thermal desorption tubes and stainless steel canisters for measuring volatile organic compounds (VOCs) emitted from petrochemical factories.
Methods:
Twelve petrochemical factories in the Mailiao Industrial Complex were recruited for conducting the measurements of VOCs. Thermal desorption tubes and 6-l specially prepared stainless steel canisters were used to simultaneously perform active sampling of environmental air samples. The sampling time of the environmental air samples was set up on 6 h close to a full work shift of the workers. A total of 94 pairwise air samples were collected by using the thermal adsorption tubes and stainless steel canisters in these 12 factories in the petrochemical industrial complex. To maximize the number of comparative data points, all the measurements from all the factories in different sampling times were lumped together to perform a linear regression analysis for each selected VOC. Pearson product-moment correlation coefficient was used to examine the correlation between the pairwise measurements of these two sampling methods. A paired t-test was also performed to examine whether the difference in the concentrations of each selected VOC measured by the two methods was statistically significant.
Results:
The correlation coefficients of seven compounds, including acetone, n-hexane, benzene, toluene, 1,2-dichloroethane, 1,3-butadiene, and styrene were >0.80 indicating the two sampling methods for these VOCs' measurements had high consistency. The paired t-tests for the measurements of n-hexane, benzene, m/p-xylene, o-xylene, 1,2-dichloroethane, and 1,3-butadiene showed statistically significant difference (P-value < 0.05). This indicated that the two sampling methods had various degrees of systematic errors. Looking at the results of six chemicals and these systematic errors probably resulted from the differences of the detection limits in the two sampling methods for these VOCs.
Conclusions:
The comparison between the concentrations of each of the 10 selected VOCs measured by the two sampling methods indicted that the thermal desorption tubes provided high accuracy and precision measurements for acetone, benzene, and 1,3-butadiene. The accuracy and precision of using the thermal desorption tubes for measuring the VOCs can be improved due to new developments in sorbent materials, multi-sorbent designs, and thermal desorption instrumentation. More applications of thermal desorption tubes for measuring occupational and environmental hazardous agents can be anticipated.
More Related Videos
05:22Rapid Collection of Floral Fragrance Volatiles using a Headspace Volatile Collection Technique for GC-MS Thermal Desorption Sampling
Published on: December 10, 2019
08:42Author Spotlight: In Vitro Co-Culture System of Pine Shoots and Pinewood Nematode for Studying Host Volatile Response
Published on: September 27, 2024
Related Concept Videos
Gas Chromatography: Types of Detectors-II
Gas Chromatography: Types of Detectors-I
TCD is the earliest and most widely used detector that operates by measuring the changes in the thermal conductivity of the carrier gas. When a sample compound enters the detector,...
Gas Chromatography: Overview of Detectors
A non-destructive detector allows a sample to be analyzed without altering or consuming it, meaning the sample can be collected after detection for further analysis. Examples include thermal conductivity detectors and...
Volatilization
Sampling Methods: Sample Types
Solid samples include a variety of substances, such as sediments from water bodies, soil, metals, and biological tissues. Two standard methods for extracting sediments from water bodies are grab sampling and piston coring. Grab sampling involves using a device to collect a discrete sediment sample from the bottom of a water body with minimal disturbance. Grab samples do not always represent the entire area due to...