Differential Counting of Asbestos Using Phase Contrast and Fluorescence Microscopy
Tomoki Nishimura1,2, Maxym Alexandrov1, Takenori Ishida1
11.Department of Molecular Biotechnology, Graduate School of Advanced Sciences of Matter, Hiroshima University, 1-3-1 Kagamiyama, Higashi-Hiroshima, Hiroshima 739-8530, Japan.
The Annals of Occupational Hygiene
|September 28, 2016
Summary
A new combined phase contrast and fluorescence microscopy (PCM-FM) method accurately detects asbestos fibers. This technique is compatible with existing exposure limits and aids in risk management for industries using asbestos substitutes.
Area of Science:
- Occupational Health and Safety
- Environmental Science
- Analytical Chemistry
Background:
- Accurate detection of asbestos fibers is crucial for risk management, especially with the rise of asbestos substitutes.
- Previous fluorescence microscopy (FM) methods offered high sensitivity but lacked compatibility with established asbestos exposure limits based on phase contrast microscopy (PCM).
Purpose of the Study:
- To develop and validate a novel differential counting method using FM that complements PCM analysis and aligns with existing epidemiological data.
- To enable rapid, on-site detection and differentiation of asbestos from non-asbestos fibers.
Main Methods:
- A combined PCM-FM method was developed, applying fluorescent asbestos-binding probes before filter clearing.
- The same fields of view were analyzed sequentially using PCM for fiber counting and FM for differentiation.
- The PCM-FM method was compared against scanning electron microscopy (SEM)-based differential counting using airborne dust samples from Japanese demolition sites.
Main Results:
- The PCM-FM method showed a slight conservative bias and variability across different fiber concentrations when compared to SEM.
- Correlative microscopy and energy-dispersive X-ray analysis confirmed high specificity, with approximately 95% of fluorescently stained fibers correctly identified as asbestos.
- The method allows seamless switching between PCM and FM for analysis of the same sample areas.
Conclusions:
- The combined PCM-FM method offers a rapid and selective approach for asbestos fiber detection in field samples.
- While further research is needed to address variability, PCM-FM is compatible with PCM-based exposure limits and epidemiological data.
- This technique supports improved asbestos risk management in industries transitioning away from asbestos materials.


