Related Experiment Videos
[Aztreonam versus tobramycin in acute pyelonephritis. A comparative study]
Archivos Espanoles De Urologia
|March 1, 1989
Summary
Aztreonam demonstrated superior clinical cure rates for acute pyelonephritis compared to tobramycin. Both antibiotics showed good tolerance, with aztreonam proving effective against susceptible organisms.
Area of Science:
- Infectious Diseases
- Pharmacology
- Nephrology
Background:
- Acute pyelonephritis is a common kidney infection.
- Antibiotic resistance is a growing concern in treating pyelonephritis.
- Aztreonam (monobactam) and tobramycin (aminoglycoside) are used for bacterial infections.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the efficacy and safety of aztreonam and tobramycin in treating acute pyelonephritis.
- To evaluate clinical and microbiological cure rates for both antibiotics.
- To assess patient tolerance and potential side effects.
Main Methods:
- A comparative study involving patients with acute pyelonephritis.
- Aztreonam administered at 1g IM daily for 7 days.
- Tobramycin administered at 100mg IM every 12 hours for 7 days.
Main Results:
- Aztreonam achieved 100% clinical cure in uncomplicated and 87.5% in complicated pyelonephritis.
- Tobramycin achieved an 80% clinical cure rate for both infection types.
- Microbiological cure rates favored aztreonam (78.7% overall) over tobramycin (70-80%), with failures linked to resistant S. faecalis.
Conclusions:
- Aztreonam is highly effective for acute pyelonephritis, particularly against susceptible pathogens.
- Both aztreonam and tobramycin exhibit good clinical and biological tolerance with no observed side effects.
- Aztreonam offers a viable treatment option for acute pyelonephritis, especially when considering pathogen susceptibility.