Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Noncovalent Attractions in Biomolecules02:35

Noncovalent Attractions in Biomolecules

66.0K
Noncovalent attractions are associations within and between molecules that influence the shape and structural stability of complexes. These interactions differ from covalent bonding in that they do not involve sharing of electrons.
Four types of noncovalent interactions are hydrogen bonds, van der Waals forces, ionic bonds, and hydrophobic interactions.
Hydrogen bonding results from the electrostatic attraction of a hydrogen atom covalently bonded to a strong-electronegative atom like oxygen,...
66.0K
Noncovalent Attractions in Biomolecules02:35

Noncovalent Attractions in Biomolecules

20.4K
20.4K
The Equilibrium Binding Constant and Binding Strength02:18

The Equilibrium Binding Constant and Binding Strength

15.6K
The equilibrium binding constant (Kb) quantifies the strength of a protein-ligand interaction. Kb can be calculated as follows when the reaction is at equilibrium:
15.6K
The Equilibrium Binding Constant and Binding Strength02:18

The Equilibrium Binding Constant and Binding Strength

10.8K
10.8K
MO Theory and Covalent Bonding02:40

MO Theory and Covalent Bonding

14.8K
The molecular orbital theory describes the distribution of electrons in molecules in a manner similar to the distribution of electrons in atomic orbitals. The region of space in which a valence electron in a molecule is likely to be found is called a molecular orbital. Mathematically, the linear combination of atomic orbitals (LCAO) generates molecular orbitals. Combinations of in-phase atomic orbital wave functions result in regions with a high probability of electron density, while...
14.8K
Molecular Orbital Theory II03:51

Molecular Orbital Theory II

28.4K
Molecular Orbital Energy Diagrams
28.4K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Analytic gradients for state-averaged multiconfiguration pair-density functional theory.

The Journal of chemical physics·2020
Same author

Semiglobal diabatic potential energy matrix for the N-H photodissociation of methylamine.

The Journal of chemical physics·2020
Same author

Many-Body Permutationally Invariant Polynomial Neural Network Potential Energy Surface for N<sub>4</sub>.

Journal of chemical theory and computation·2020
Same author

Salt-rich solid electrolyte interphase for safer high-energy-density Li metal batteries with limited Li excess.

Chemical communications (Cambridge, England)·2020
Same author

Calculating and Characterizing the Charge Distributions in Solids.

Journal of chemical theory and computation·2020
Same author

Spin Splitting Energy of Transition Metals: A New, More Affordable Wave Function Benchmark Method and Its Use to Test Density Functional Theory.

Journal of chemical theory and computation·2020

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Mar 29, 2026

Computation of Atmospheric Concentrations of Molecular Clusters from ab initio Thermochemistry
12:11

Computation of Atmospheric Concentrations of Molecular Clusters from ab initio Thermochemistry

Published on: April 8, 2020

8.8K

Benchmark Databases for Nonbonded Interactions and Their Use To Test Density Functional Theory.

Yan Zhao1, Donald G Truhlar1

  • 1Department of Chemistry and Supercomputing Institute, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55455-0431.

Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation
|December 8, 2015
PubMed
Summary

Researchers evaluated 45 computational methods for predicting binding energies in nonbonded complexes. The MPWB1K density functional theory (DFT) method demonstrated the best overall performance for various interactions, showing significant improvements in accuracy.

More Related Videos

Thermochemical Studies of NiII and ZnII Ternary Complexes Using Ion Mobility-Mass Spectrometry
16:11

Thermochemical Studies of NiII and ZnII Ternary Complexes Using Ion Mobility-Mass Spectrometry

Published on: June 8, 2022

2.8K
Multiscale Sampling of a Heterogeneous Water/Metal Catalyst Interface using Density Functional Theory and Force-Field Molecular Dynamics
10:52

Multiscale Sampling of a Heterogeneous Water/Metal Catalyst Interface using Density Functional Theory and Force-Field Molecular Dynamics

Published on: April 12, 2019

13.5K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Mar 29, 2026

Computation of Atmospheric Concentrations of Molecular Clusters from ab initio Thermochemistry
12:11

Computation of Atmospheric Concentrations of Molecular Clusters from ab initio Thermochemistry

Published on: April 8, 2020

8.8K
Thermochemical Studies of NiII and ZnII Ternary Complexes Using Ion Mobility-Mass Spectrometry
16:11

Thermochemical Studies of NiII and ZnII Ternary Complexes Using Ion Mobility-Mass Spectrometry

Published on: June 8, 2022

2.8K
Multiscale Sampling of a Heterogeneous Water/Metal Catalyst Interface using Density Functional Theory and Force-Field Molecular Dynamics
10:52

Multiscale Sampling of a Heterogeneous Water/Metal Catalyst Interface using Density Functional Theory and Force-Field Molecular Dynamics

Published on: April 12, 2019

13.5K

Area of Science:

  • Computational Chemistry
  • Quantum Chemistry
  • Molecular Modeling

Background:

  • Accurate prediction of binding energies is crucial for understanding nonbonded interactions in molecular systems.
  • Existing computational methods vary in their performance for different types of nonbonded interactions.
  • Development of reliable and accurate computational tools is essential for advancing chemical research.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To establish benchmark databases for evaluating the accuracy of computational methods in predicting binding energies.
  • To assess the performance of a wide range of density functional theory (DFT) and wave function theory (WFT) methods.
  • To identify the most accurate methods for different types of nonbonded interactions, including hydrogen bonding, charge transfer, dipole interactions, and weak interactions.

Main Methods:

  • Creation of four benchmark databases containing binding energies for nonbonded complexes.
  • Testing of 44 DFT methods and 1 WFT method against these databases.
  • Evaluation of method performance based on relative error for hydrogen bonding, charge transfer, dipole, and weak interactions.

Main Results:

  • Specific DFT functionals (PBE, PBE1PBE, B3P86, MPW1K, B97-1, BHandHLYP) excelled in hydrogen bonding predictions.
  • MPWB1K, MP2, MPW1B95, MPW1K, and BHandHLYP showed top performance for charge-transfer interactions.
  • MPWB1K demonstrated the best overall performance among all tested DFT methods, with an average relative error of 11%.

Conclusions:

  • The MPWB1K method is identified as a highly accurate DFT approach for predicting binding energies of nonbonded complexes.
  • DFT methods like MPW1K, PBE1PBE, and B98 are recommended for cases where kinetic energy density is not included.
  • Advancing along the 'Jacob's ladder' of DFT, such as with PBE and TPSS functionals, shows significant improvements for nonbonded interactions.