Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 29, 2026

An Experimental Analysis of Children's Ability to Provide a False Report about a Crime
Published on: May 3, 2016
The dynamic nature of interrogation
Christopher E Kelly1, Jeaneé C Miller2, Allison D Redlich2
1Department of Sociology & Criminal Justice, Saint Joseph's University.
Police interrogation tactics significantly impact suspect cooperation. Rapport-building enhances cooperation, while confrontational methods and evidence presentation decrease it, with negative effects lasting up to 15 minutes.
Area of Science:
- Psychology
- Criminology
- Forensic Science
Background:
- Existing research on police interrogation methods primarily offers static analyses of tactics used.
- Previous studies have focused on the reported or observed frequency and conditions of specific interrogation techniques.
Purpose of the Study:
- To analyze police interrogation as a dynamic process, examining changes in methods and suspect cooperation over time.
- To investigate how different interrogation domains (rapport, emotion provocation, evidence presentation, confrontation) influence suspect cooperation.
Main Methods:
- Analysis of audio and video recordings of interrogations for serious violent crimes.
- Coding interrogation recordings in 5-minute intervals using the interrogation taxonomy framework.
- Regression modeling to assess the impact of interrogation domains on suspect cooperation.
Main Results:
- The emphasis on different interrogation domains varied significantly between confessions and denials.
- Suspect cooperation was positively associated with rapport and relationship building.
- Suspect cooperation was negatively impacted by the presentation of evidence and confrontation/competition, with these effects persisting for up to 15 minutes.
Conclusions:
- Rapport-based interrogation approaches appear beneficial for eliciting cooperation.
- Accusatorial methods, particularly confrontation, can have detrimental and lasting effects on suspect cooperation.
- Future research should focus on the temporal dynamics of interrogation techniques rather than just their presence or absence.
Related Concept Videos
The Stanford Prison Experiment
Understanding Deception
Naturalistic Observations
Levels of Communication II: Organizational, Public, and Group Dynamics
Robbers Cave
Impression Management Techniques II: Ingratiation

