Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 29, 2026

Examining Online Syntactic Processing of Spoken Complex Sentences in Chinese Using Dual-Modal Interference Tasks
Published on: September 5, 2019
Reading span task performance, linguistic experience, and the processing of unexpected syntactic events.
Thomas A Farmer1,2, Alex B Fine3, Jennifer B Misyak4
1a Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences , University of Iowa , Iowa City , IA , USA.
Individual differences in reading span scores reflect both verbal working memory and linguistic experience. Higher reading spans correlate with better sensitivity to statistical language regularities, highlighting the role of print exposure in language processing.
Area of Science:
- Cognitive Psychology
- Psycholinguistics
- Individual Differences
Background:
- Reading span tasks are commonly used to measure verbal working memory, a key factor in language processing.
- Individual differences in reading span performance may also be influenced by a person's linguistic experiences, particularly with written language.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the relationship between reading span scores and print exposure.
- To examine how reading span ability relates to online language processing, specifically sensitivity to statistical regularities in language.
- To determine if these relationships persist after controlling for non-linguistic cognitive abilities.
Main Methods:
- Assessed individual differences in reading span and non-linguistic operation span tasks.
- Measured print exposure using proxy estimates.
- Analyzed reading times on garden-path sentences to gauge sensitivity to statistical language regularities.
Main Results:
- Reading span scores significantly correlated with measures of print exposure.
- Individuals with higher reading spans showed greater sensitivity to statistical language regularities, indicated by longer reading times on ambiguous sentence regions.
- This effect remained significant even after controlling for individual differences in non-linguistic operation span.
Conclusions:
- Reading span scores are influenced by both verbal working memory and linguistic experience (print exposure).
- Experiential factors, such as print exposure, play a crucial role in online sentence processing and individual differences in this ability.
- Future research on individual differences in language processing should incorporate experiential factors alongside cognitive abilities.
More Related Videos
04:30An Experimental Paradigm for Measuring the Effects of Ageing on Sentence Processing
Published on: October 25, 2019
05:22Dissociation of the Confounding Influences of Expectancy and Integrative Difficulty Residing in Anomalous Sentences in Event-related Potential Studies
Published on: May 9, 2019
Related Concept Videos
Automatic Processing and Automatic Social Behavior
Language and Cognition
Language Development
The critical period for language acquisition suggests that the ability to acquire language is at its peak early in life. As people age, this proficiency decreases. Language development begins very...
Framing Effects
Components of Language
Schemas