Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 28, 2026

Array Comparative Genomic Hybridization Array CGH for Detection of Genomic Copy Number Variants
Published on: February 21, 2015
Copy number variants prioritization after array-CGH analysis - a cohort of 1000 patients
Isabel Marques Carreira1, Susana Isabel Ferreira2, Eunice Matoso3
1Laboratório de Citogenética e Genómica - Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de Coimbra, Pólo Ciências da Saúde, Sub-Unidade 1 - Piso 2, Azinhaga de Santa Comba, 3000-354 Coimbra, Portugal ; CIMAGO - Centro de Investigação em Meio Ambiente, Genética e Oncobiologia, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal ; Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal ; CNC, IBILI - Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal.
Background:
Array-based comparative genomic hybridization has been assumed to be the first genetic test offered to detect genomic imbalances in patients with unexplained intellectual disability with or without dysmorphisms, multiple congenital anomalies, learning difficulties and autism spectrum disorders. Our study contributes to the genotype/phenotype correlation with the delineation of laboratory criteria which help to classify the different copy number variants (CNVs) detected. We clustered our findings into five classes ranging from an imbalance detected in a microdeletion/duplication syndrome region (class I) to imbalances that had previously been reported in normal subjects in the Database of Genomic Variants (DGV) and thus considered common variants (class IV).
Results:
All the analyzed 1000 patients had at least one CNV independently of its clinical significance. Most of them, as expected, were alterations already reported in the DGV for normal individuals (class IV) or without known coding genes (class III-B). In approximately 14 % of the patients an imbalance involving known coding genes, but with partially overlapping or low frequency of CNVs described in the DGV was identified (class IIIA). In 10.4 % of the patients a pathogenic CNV that explained the phenotype was identified consisting of: 40 class I imbalances, 44 class II de novo imbalances and 21 class II X-chromosome imbalances in male patients. In 20 % of the patients a familial pathogenic or potentially pathogenic CNV, consisting of inherited class II imbalances, was identified that implied a family evaluation by the clinical geneticists.
Conclusions:
As this interpretation can be sometimes difficult, particularly if it is not possible to study the parents, using the proposed classification we were able to prioritize the multiple imbalances that are identified in each patient without immediately having to classify them as pathogenic or benign.
More Related Videos
09:33Author Spotlight: Finding New Therapeutic Targets for Malignant Peripheral Nerve Sheath Tumor Through Genome-Scale shRNA Screens
Published on: August 25, 2023
05:53Candidate Gene Testing in Clinical Cohort Studies with Multiplexed Genotyping and Mass Spectrometry
Published on: June 21, 2018
Related Concept Videos
Comparing Copy Number Variations and SNPs
Copy number variations or CNVs are the structural variations that cover more than 1kb of DNA sequence. The single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP), on the other hand, is a single nucleotide change or a point mutation that is found in more than 1%...
Principles of Pharmacogenetics: Types of Genetic Variants
Genome-wide Association Studies-GWAS
GWAS does not require the identification of the target gene involved in...