Reciprocity in group-living animals: partner control versus partner choice
Gabriele Schino1, Filippo Aureli2,3
1Istituto di Scienze e Tecnologie della Cognizione, Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche, Rome, Italy.
Biological Reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society
|January 7, 2016
Summary
Cooperation in animals arises from partner control and partner choice. Partner choice appears more common in primates, suggesting varied evolutionary paths for cooperation in social groups.
Area of Science:
- Evolutionary Biology
- Animal Behavior
- Primatology
Background:
- Reciprocity is a key evolutionary explanation for cooperation, but its mechanisms are debated.
- Existing research often conflates partner control and partner choice as drivers of reciprocity.
- Understanding these distinct mechanisms is crucial for explaining cooperative behaviors in social animals.
Purpose of the Study:
- To differentiate between partner control and partner choice as distinct processes underlying reciprocity.
- To investigate the prevalence of partner choice in primate cooperation.
- To propose explanations for observed patterns of reciprocity in primates.
Main Methods:
- Review of existing empirical evidence on reciprocity in group-living animals, with a focus on primates.
- Analysis of cooperative behaviors and their correlation with received cooperation.
- Theoretical framework to distinguish the effects of partner control versus partner choice.
Main Results:
- Cooperative behaviors in group-living animals are influenced by both partner control and partner choice.
- Evidence suggests partner choice is the dominant mechanism driving reciprocity in primates.
- Observed preferential cooperation is a result of the combined effects of these two processes.
Conclusions:
- Distinguishing partner control and partner choice clarifies the evolutionary basis of cooperation.
- Partner choice plays a significant role in primate social dynamics and cooperation.
- Further research is needed across diverse taxa to fully elucidate the roles of partner control and partner choice.
Related Concept Videos
Altruism
48.8K
Altruistic behaviors are “unselfish” behaviors—those that help another individual at the expense of the individual carrying out the behavior. Despite the negative consequences for the altruistic animal, these behaviors are thought to have evolved for several reasons.
48.8K
Inclusive Fitness
43.8K
Most altruistic behavior—in which one animal helps another at a cost to themselves—occurs between relatives. Scientists think these altruistic behaviors evolved because they increase the inclusive fitness of the animal providing help.
43.8K
Nonconscious Mimicry
5.2K
Nonconscious mimicry occurs when individuals alter their mannerisms to match the behaviors and expressions of those nearby, without intention.
5.2K
In- and Out-Groups
44.1K
People all belong to a gender, race, age, and social economic group. These groups provide a powerful source of our identity and self-esteem (Tajfel & Turner, 1979) and serve as our in-groups. An in-group is a group that we identify with or see ourselves as belonging to.
44.1K
Symbiosis
38.4K
Symbiotic relationships are long-term, close interactions between individuals of different species that affect the distribution and abundance of those species. When a relationship is beneficial to both species, this is called mutualism. When the relationship is beneficial to one species but neither beneficial nor harmful to the other species, this is called commensalism. When one organism is harmed to benefit another, the relationship is known as parasitism. These types of relationships often...
38.4K
Communication
8.9K
Communication between two animals occurs when one animal transmits an information signal that causes a change in the animal that receives the information. Organisms communicate with one another in a host of different ways. Signals can be auditory, chemical, visual, tactile, or a combination of these. Communication is a critical behavioral adaptation that promotes survival, growth, and reproduction.
8.9K


