Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Phase Contrast and Differential Interference Contrast Microscopy

Phase Contrast and Differential Interference Contrast Microscopy

Phase-Contrast Microscopes
In-phase-contrast microscopes, interference between light directly passing through a cell and light refracted by cellular components is used to create high-contrast, high-resolution images without staining. It is the oldest and simplest type of microscope that creates an image by altering the wavelengths of light rays passing through the specimen. Altered wavelength paths are created using an annular stop in the condenser. The annular stop produces a hollow cone of...

Confocal Fluorescence Microscopy

Confocal Fluorescence Microscopy

Confocal microscopy is an advanced microscopic technique. The prime advantage of the confocal microscope over other microscopy techniques is its ability to block the out-of-focus light from the illuminated samples using pinholes. It is widely used with fluorescence optics to obtain high-resolution, sharp contrast images. Unlike optical microscopes, confocal microscopes use a focused beam of light laser to scan the entire sample surface at different z-planes. These microscopes are, therefore,...

Three-Dimensional Microscopy in Microbiology

Three-Dimensional Microscopy in Microbiology

Three-dimensional imaging techniques are essential in cell biology, allowing researchers to visualize intricate cellular structures with high resolution. Two prominent methods, Differential Interference Contrast Microscopy (DIC) and Confocal Scanning Laser Microscopy (CSLM), provide distinct advantages for imaging live and thick specimens, respectively.Differential Interference Contrast MicroscopyDIC microscopy enhances contrast in transparent, unstained samples by converting phase...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

The mitochondrial genome of <i>Tetrahymena rostrata</i>.

Mitochondrial DNA. Part B, Resources·2020

Same author

Human errors in manual techniques for ABO/D grouping are associated with potentially lethal outcomes.

Transfusion medicine (Oxford, England)·2019

Same author

Shortage of paediatric radiologists acting as an expert witness: position statement from the British Society of Paediatric Radiology (BSPR) National Working Group on Imaging in Suspected Physical Abuse (SPA).

Clinical radiology·2019

Same author

Perceptual and adaptive learning modules and their potential to transform cytology training programmes.

Cytopathology : official journal of the British Society for Clinical Cytology·2018

Same author

Fundamental movement skills in adolescents: Secular trends from 2003 to 2010 and associations with physical activity and BMI.

Scandinavian journal of medicine & science in sports·2017

Same author

The prevalence problem in the era of human papillomavirus screening.

Cytopathology : official journal of the British Society for Clinical Cytology·2017

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Mar 26, 2026

Observation of the Ciliary Movement of Choroid Plexus Epithelial Cells Ex Vivo

Observation of the Ciliary Movement of Choroid Plexus Epithelial Cells Ex Vivo

Published on: July 13, 2015

Visual distraction in cytopathology: should we be concerned?

A Evered^1,2, D Walker³, A Watt³

¹Cervical Screening Wales, Cardiff, UK. aevered@cardiffmet.ac.uk.

Cytopathology : Official Journal of the British Society for Clinical Cytology

|January 23, 2016

Summary

Visual distraction does not impact diagnostic accuracy in virtual microscopy. This study found no significant effect on cell interpretation, suggesting it

Keywords:

cognition cytopathology distraction virtual microscopy visual perception

More Related Videos

Impression Cytology of the Lid Wiper Area

Impression Cytology of the Lid Wiper Area

Published on: August 9, 2016

Grossing of Non-neoplastic Globes, Including Fetal Eyes

Grossing of Non-neoplastic Globes, Including Fetal Eyes

Published on: May 30, 2025

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Mar 26, 2026

Observation of the Ciliary Movement of Choroid Plexus Epithelial Cells Ex Vivo

Observation of the Ciliary Movement of Choroid Plexus Epithelial Cells Ex Vivo

Published on: July 13, 2015

Impression Cytology of the Lid Wiper Area

Impression Cytology of the Lid Wiper Area

Published on: August 9, 2016

Grossing of Non-neoplastic Globes, Including Fetal Eyes

Grossing of Non-neoplastic Globes, Including Fetal Eyes

Published on: May 30, 2025

Area of Science:

Cytopathology
Medical Imaging
Human Factors in Medicine

Background:

Virtual microscopy is emerging as a diagnostic tool in cytopathology, potentially altering the visual field compared to traditional light microscopy.
The impact of visual distraction on diagnostic accuracy in virtual microscopy has not been previously studied.

Purpose of the Study:

To investigate whether visual distraction affects the accuracy and speed of cell interpretation in virtual microscopy.
To assess the influence of peripheral visual stimuli on diagnostic performance under simulated reading room conditions.

Main Methods:

A visual distraction paradigm (Eriksen flanker task) was employed.
31 cytology novices performed cell interpretation tests under varying visual distraction conditions.
Diagnostic error rates were measured to quantify performance.

Main Results:

No statistically significant effect of visual distraction on diagnostic accuracy was observed.
The speed of cell interpretation was not significantly impacted by the presence of distractors.

Conclusions:

Visual distraction is unlikely to be a significant source of diagnostic error in virtual microscopy.
Factors such as efficient visual selection, spatial attention, high perceptual load, and distractor location likely mitigate distraction effects.