Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 26, 2026

Problem-Solving Before Instruction PS-I: A Protocol for Assessment and Intervention in Students with Different Abilities
Published on: September 11, 2021
Toward More Robust Inferential Procedures for Coefficient Alpha Under Sampling of Both Subjects and Conditions
Abstract:
Barchard and Hakstian (1997b) demonstrated that inferential procedures used with coefficient alpha are not robust under sampling of both subjects and conditions (Type 12 sampling) with measurement data departing from essentially-parallel form. In the first of 2 studies reported here, a sample-based, non-analytical degrees-of-freedom correction factor was empirically developed that correlated almost perfectly with the independently-established correct degrees of freedom for the data. In the second study, application of this correction factor was assessed through a comprehensive simulation study involving Type 12 data sets representing a wide range of design characteristics and manifesting tau-equivalent measurement. Use of the correction factor yielded actual Type I error rates closer to nominal values than were obtained using uncorrected inferential procedures. Implications for practice and future research are discussed.
Related Concept Videos
Bonferroni Test
The means of different samples are first paired in all possible combinations.
The null hypothesis of the...
One-Way ANOVA: Equal Sample Sizes
Different sample means can result in different values for the variance estimate: variance between samples. This is because the variance between samples is calculated as the product of the sample size and the variance between the...
One-Way ANOVA: Unequal Sample Sizes
Accuracy and Errors in Hypothesis Testing
In hypothesis testing, the probability of making a Type I error, denoted as α, is commonly set at 0.05. This significance level indicates a 5%...
Confidence Coefficient
One-Way ANOVA

