Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 26, 2026

07:16
Spatula Montevideo Device for the Vitrification of Mammalian Embryos
Published on: June 6, 2025
931
Development of Cheaper Embryo Vitrification Device Using the Minimum Volume Method.
Francisco Marco-Jiménez1, Estrella Jiménez-Trigos2, Victoria Almela-Miralles1
1Instituto de Ciencia y Tecnología Animal, Universidad Politècnica de València, Valencia, Spain.
Plos One
|February 6, 2016
Summary
The Calibrated Plastic Inoculation Loop (CPIL) device is as effective as the Cryotop device for rabbit embryo vitrification. This cost-effective CPIL method offers comparable in vitro development and implantation rates, making it a viable alternative for assisted reproduction technologies.
Area of Science:
- Reproductive Biology
- Embryology
- Cryopreservation Techniques
Background:
- Vitrification is a key technique in assisted reproductive technologies for preserving embryos.
- The Cryotop device is a widely used method for embryo vitrification.
- The Calibrated Plastic Inoculation Loop (CPIL) is a novel, cost-effective tool for retrieving biological samples.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the efficiency of the Cryotop and CPIL devices for rabbit embryo vitrification.
- To evaluate the impact of these vitrification methods on in vitro embryo development.
- To assess implantation rates, offspring viability, and embryonic/fetal losses post-vitrification.
Main Methods:
- Rabbit embryos were vitrified using either the Cryotop device or the CPIL device.
- In vitro development was assessed by culturing vitrified embryos for 48 hours.
- Implantation rates and offspring rates were determined after laparoscopic transfer and monitoring gestation to birth.
Main Results:
- No significant difference was observed in hatched blastocyst rates between Cryotop and CPIL groups (62%).
- Implantation rates (56% vs. 50%) and offspring rates (40% vs. 35%) were comparable between Cryotop and CPIL devices.
- Both vitrification methods resulted in lower rates compared to fresh embryos, with similar embryonic and fetal loss rates between Cryotop and CPIL.
Conclusions:
- The CPIL device demonstrates comparable efficacy to the Cryotop device for rabbit embryo vitrification.
- CPIL offers a cost-effective alternative (€0.05 per device) for embryo vitrification without compromising developmental outcomes.
- This study supports the potential of CPIL as a practical and economical tool in veterinary embryology and cryopreservation.

