Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 24, 2026

Modified Drop Tower Impact Tests for American Football Helmets
Published on: February 19, 2017
Physical Differences Between Forwards and Backs in American Collegiate Rugby Players
Michael B La Monica1, David H Fukuda, Amelia A Miramonti
11Institute of Exercise Physiology and Wellness, Sport and Exercise Science, University of Central Florida, Orlando, Florida; and 2Faculty of Health and Sport Sciences, University of Tsukuba, Ibaraki, Japan.
Forwards in American collegiate rugby are heavier and stronger, while backs exhibit higher aerobic capacity. These physical differences between rugby positions can inform player development and recruitment strategies.
Area of Science:
- Sports Science
- Biomechanics
- Physiology
Background:
- Rugby demands diverse physical attributes, necessitating an understanding of positional differences.
- Previous research has explored some physical disparities between rugby forwards and backs.
Purpose of the Study:
- To examine anthropometric and physical performance differences between forwards and backs in American male collegiate rugby players.
- To provide descriptive data that can serve as potential standards for player development and recruitment.
Main Methods:
- Assessed 25 male collegiate rugby players, categorizing them into forwards (n=13) and backs (n=12).
- Evaluated anthropometrics (height, weight, body fat percentage), muscle characteristics (vastus lateralis CSA, MT, PA), maximal strength (1RM bench press and squat), power (vertical jump), force production (midthigh pull), aerobic capacity (V[Combining Dot Above]O2peak), agility, and speed (40-m sprint, tethered sprint).
- Analyzed differences using independent t-tests with Cohen's d effect size.
Main Results:
- Forwards were significantly heavier, had higher body fat percentage, greater vastus lateralis muscle CSA, and superior 1RM bench press and squat strength compared to backs.
- Forwards also demonstrated significantly higher peak force and peak velocity during sprints, with longer step lengths.
- Backs exhibited significantly higher maximal aerobic capacity (V[Combining Dot Above]O2peak), while no significant differences in agility were observed between groups.
Conclusions:
- Significant anthropometric and performance distinctions exist between forwards and backs in American collegiate rugby.
- Forwards are characterized by greater mass, strength, and power, whereas backs possess superior aerobic fitness.
- These findings offer valuable insights for coaches in talent identification, player profiling, and targeted training program design.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Social Facilitation
Directional Terms
Anatomical Positions
The body is upright, facing forward, and standing erect.
The feet are parallel and flat on the floor.
The arms are hanging by the...
Vertebral Column: Regions and Curvature
Regions of the Vertebral Column
In an adult, the spine is subdivided into five regions: the cervical, the thoracic, the lumbar, the sacral, and the coccygeal region. The spine initially develops as a series of 33 vertebrae; after 20 years of age, the nine bones in the sacral region, five sacral, and four coccygeal bones fuse to form...
General Structure of a Vertebra
Muscles of the Vertebral Column
Superficial Layer:
The superficial layer consists primarily of the splenius muscles, which include the splenius capitis and splenius cervicis. These muscles are mainly responsible for the head and cervical spine movements, including extension, rotation, and lateral bending. The splenius capitis...

