Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 24, 2026
05:47
Simulation of a Scaled Assembly Process with Collaboration of a Robotic Arm and Monitoring through a Vision System for Quality Control
Published on: August 29, 2025
580
Can a Focus on Preventable Events Help Untangle the Quality Measurement Mess?
1Director of Strategic Policy, Community Catalyst, Boston, Massachusetts.
The Journal of Ambulatory Care Management
|March 6, 2016
Summary
Shifting healthcare payments requires accurate quality measurement. Focusing on preventable events offers a clearer path, but faces significant challenges.
Area of Science:
- Healthcare Economics
- Quality Improvement Science
Background:
- Current healthcare payment models based on volume are inadequate.
- Existing quality measurement and payment linkage methods frustrate providers and offer little patient value.
- A transition to value-based care necessitates robust quality metrics.
Discussion:
- Measuring healthcare quality is crucial for successful value-based payment models.
- Current quality metrics are complex and fail to adequately inform patients or providers.
- A focus on preventable events presents a potential solution for simplifying quality measurement.
Key Insights:
- Effective quality measurement is fundamental to value-based healthcare.
- Provider dissatisfaction and lack of patient information highlight flaws in current systems.
- Preventable events offer a promising, albeit challenging, alternative for quality assessment.
Outlook:
- Overcoming substantive and political hurdles is essential for adopting a preventable events approach.
- Future healthcare payment reforms must prioritize accurate and transparent quality measurement.
- Simplifying quality measurement through event-based analysis could improve healthcare delivery.
Related Concept Videos
03:37Uncertainty in Measurement: Accuracy and Precision
113.5K
Scientists typically make repeated measurements of a quantity to ensure the quality of their findings and to evaluate both the precision and the accuracy of their results. Measurements are said to be precise if they yield very similar results when repeated in the same manner. A measurement is considered accurate if it yields a result that is very close to the true or the accepted value. Precise values agree with each other; accurate values agree with a true value.
113.5K
01:20Random and Systematic Errors
16.0K
Scientists always try their best to record measurements with the utmost accuracy and precision. However, sometimes errors do occur. These errors can be random or systematic. Random errors are observed due to the inconsistency or fluctuation in the measurement process, or variations in the quantity itself that is being measured. Such errors fluctuate from being greater than or less than the true value in repeated measurements. Consider a scientist measuring the length of an earthworm using a...
16.0K
01:20Random and Systematic Errors
927
927
01:19Quality Assurance
3.9K
Quality assurance is the overarching term used to describe the activities employed to ensure the proper performance of a system. These activities can be classified into three categories: quality control, quality assessment, and internal corrective measures. Typically, these activities work cyclically: quality control is performed before and during the analysis, while quality assessment occurs during and after the investigation. Internal corrective measures are implemented based on the findings...
3.9K
01:15Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors
11.3K
In the case of systematic errors, the sources can be identified, and the errors can be subsequently minimized by addressing these sources. According to the source, systematic errors can be divided into sampling, instrumental, methodological, and personal errors.
Sampling errors originate from improper sampling methods or the wrong sample population. These errors can be minimized by refining the sampling strategy. Defective instruments or faulty calibrations are the sources of instrumental...
Sampling errors originate from improper sampling methods or the wrong sample population. These errors can be minimized by refining the sampling strategy. Defective instruments or faulty calibrations are the sources of instrumental...
11.3K
01:25Errors occurring during blood pressure monitoring
1.8K
Blood pressure monitoring is a crucial clinical procedure in diagnosing and managing various cardiovascular conditions. Despite its significance, the accuracy of blood pressure measurements can be compromised by multiple factors, potentially leading to either falsely high or low readings. These inaccuracies are critical as they can significantly impact patient care. So, it is vital to understand these challenges deeply and adopt strategic approaches to minimize errors.
Several factors...
Several factors...
1.8K