Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches01:23

Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches

520
Biopharmaceutical studies constitute a vital field aiming to enhance drug delivery methods and refine therapeutic approaches, drawing upon diverse interdisciplinary knowledge. In research methodologies, the choice between controlled and non-controlled studies significantly influences the study's reliability and accuracy.
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
520
Critical Region, Critical Values and Significance Level01:16

Critical Region, Critical Values and Significance Level

13.7K
The critical region, critical value, and significance level are interdependent concepts crucial in hypothesis testing.
In hypothesis testing, a sample statistic is converted to a test statistic using z, t, or chi-square distribution. A critical region is an area under the curve in  probability distributions demarcated by the critical value. When the test statistic falls in this region, it suggests that the null hypothesis must be rejected. As this region contains all those values of the...
13.7K
Decision Making: P-value Method01:09

Decision Making: P-value Method

7.1K
The process of hypothesis testing based on the P-value method includes calculating the P- value using the sample data and interpreting it.
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is proposed. The claim is based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to the claim  is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses:  a null hypothesis would be a neutral statement while the alternative hypothesis can...
7.1K
Framing Effects03:26

Framing Effects

8.1K
Information is everywhere and its presentation—such as how and when items are presented—can impact our perceptions and decisions surrounding the info. This broad concept umbrellas framing effects—influences that occur due to the way information is framed in its appearance, whether it’s purely the order or the specific wording of a message. Let’s take a look at numerous ways in which two versions of something can objectively say the same thing, yet we respond in...
8.1K
Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors01:15

Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors

11.3K
In the case of systematic errors, the sources can be identified, and the errors can be subsequently minimized by addressing these sources. According to the source, systematic errors can be divided into sampling, instrumental, methodological, and personal errors.
Sampling errors originate from improper sampling methods or the wrong sample population. These errors can be minimized by refining the sampling strategy. Defective instruments or faulty calibrations are the sources of instrumental...
11.3K
Feedback Inhibition00:46

Feedback Inhibition

58.5K
Biochemical reactions are occurring constantly in cells, converting starting substances to different products, usually with the help of enzymes that speed the reactions. Without enzymes, it would take far too long for most reactions to occur to be useful to the cell!
58.5K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Podium Abstracts Presented at the 2025 Annual Meeting of the Arthroscopy Association of North America.

Arthroscopy : the journal of arthroscopic & related surgery : official publication of the Arthroscopy Association of North America and the International Arthroscopy Association·2026
Same author

Editorial Commentary: Is the Cure Worse Than the Disease? Harvesting Autologous Osteochondral Transfer Plugs for Treatment of Lesions of the Elbow.

Arthroscopy : the journal of arthroscopic & related surgery : official publication of the Arthroscopy Association of North America and the International Arthroscopy Association·2018
Same author

Editorial Commentary: Don't Forgot the Hip in Swimmers and Multisport Athletes.

Arthroscopy : the journal of arthroscopic & related surgery : official publication of the Arthroscopy Association of North America and the International Arthroscopy Association·2018
Same author

Related Research and Arthroscopy: Increasing the Breadth of Arthroscopy and Arthroscopy Techniques.

Arthroscopy : the journal of arthroscopic & related surgery : official publication of the Arthroscopy Association of North America and the International Arthroscopy Association·2017
Same author

Editorial Commentary: Is the Information Gathered From Patient-Reported Outcome Worth the Time and Effort? Electronic Patient-Reported Outcome Data Collection Systems Result in Poor Response Rate.

Arthroscopy : the journal of arthroscopic & related surgery : official publication of the Arthroscopy Association of North America and the International Arthroscopy Association·2017
Same author

Editorial Commentary: When a Tie Is Still a Win: Systematic Reviews Showing No Difference Between Treatments May Not Be Generalizable to Individual Patients.

Arthroscopy : the journal of arthroscopic & related surgery : official publication of the Arthroscopy Association of North America and the International Arthroscopy Association·2017
Same journal

Editorial Commentary: The Lateral Femoral Condyle Angle: Adding Another Piece to the Complex Puzzle of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injury Risk.

Arthroscopy : the journal of arthroscopic & related surgery : official publication of the Arthroscopy Association of North America and the International Arthroscopy Association·2026
Same journal

Lateral Femoral Condyle Angle Is an Anatomic Risk Factor for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Primary Injury and Secondary Graft Rerupture.

Arthroscopy : the journal of arthroscopic & related surgery : official publication of the Arthroscopy Association of North America and the International Arthroscopy Association·2026
Same journal

Labral Hypoplasia by Preoperative Magnetic Resonance Imaging Predicts Higher Revision and Arthroplasty Risk After Hip Arthroscopy for Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome at 10 Year Follow-Up.

Arthroscopy : the journal of arthroscopic & related surgery : official publication of the Arthroscopy Association of North America and the International Arthroscopy Association·2026
Same journal

Hip Arthroscopic Labral Repair for Femoroacetabular Impingement Yields High Return-to-Sport Rates and Improved Outcomes in Basketball Players.

Arthroscopy : the journal of arthroscopic & related surgery : official publication of the Arthroscopy Association of North America and the International Arthroscopy Association·2026
Same journal

Editorial Commentary: Adding a Modified Lemaire Reconstruction to Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Does Not Affect the Forgotten Joint Score-12 at 2 Years.

Arthroscopy : the journal of arthroscopic & related surgery : official publication of the Arthroscopy Association of North America and the International Arthroscopy Association·2026
Same journal

Modified Lemaire Anterolateral Corner Reconstruction Does Not Impact Forgotten Joint Score-12 at 2 Years in Hamstring Graft Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstructions in High-Risk Patients.

Arthroscopy : the journal of arthroscopic & related surgery : official publication of the Arthroscopy Association of North America and the International Arthroscopy Association·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Mar 24, 2026

Operant Protocols for Assessing the Cost-benefit Analysis During Reinforced Decision Making by Rodents
07:05

Operant Protocols for Assessing the Cost-benefit Analysis During Reinforced Decision Making by Rodents

Published on: September 10, 2018

6.6K

Editorial Commentary: Risks Versus Benefits.

Merrick J Wetzler

    Arthroscopy : the Journal of Arthroscopic & Related Surgery : Official Publication of the Arthroscopy Association of North America and the International Arthroscopy Association
    |March 7, 2016
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    This study informs orthopaedic surgeons about the risks of elbow arthroscopy. Patients can be better counseled on the benefits versus risks of this common surgical procedure.

    More Related Videos

    An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model
    05:37

    An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model

    Published on: September 16, 2022

    2.7K
    Errors as a Means of Reducing Impulsive Food Choice
    07:07

    Errors as a Means of Reducing Impulsive Food Choice

    Published on: June 5, 2016

    9.3K

    Related Experiment Videos

    Last Updated: Mar 24, 2026

    Operant Protocols for Assessing the Cost-benefit Analysis During Reinforced Decision Making by Rodents
    07:05

    Operant Protocols for Assessing the Cost-benefit Analysis During Reinforced Decision Making by Rodents

    Published on: September 10, 2018

    6.6K
    An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model
    05:37

    An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model

    Published on: September 16, 2022

    2.7K
    Errors as a Means of Reducing Impulsive Food Choice
    07:07

    Errors as a Means of Reducing Impulsive Food Choice

    Published on: June 5, 2016

    9.3K

    Area of Science:

    • Orthopaedic Surgery
    • Sports Medicine
    • Patient Safety

    Background:

    • Orthopaedic surgeons routinely evaluate the risks and benefits of surgical procedures.
    • Informed patient consent is crucial for all medical interventions.
    • Elbow arthroscopy is a common procedure with potential risks.

    Discussion:

    • The study by Werner et al. provides valuable data for risk-benefit analysis in elbow arthroscopy.
    • Understanding procedural risks enhances patient counseling and shared decision-making.
    • This research supports evidence-based practice in orthopaedic surgery.

    Key Insights:

    • Accurate risk assessment is vital for patient safety in elbow arthroscopy.
    • Surgeons can utilize study findings to improve patient education on arthroscopic elbow surgery.
    • Data from Werner et al. aids in optimizing patient outcomes by managing expectations.

    Outlook:

    • Further research should explore long-term outcomes and complication rates of elbow arthroscopy.
    • Developing standardized risk stratification tools for elbow procedures is recommended.
    • Integrating patient-reported outcome measures will enhance the evaluation of elbow arthroscopy effectiveness.