Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 24, 2026

Drug-Induced Sleep Endoscopy DISE with Target Controlled Infusion TCI and Bispectral Analysis in Obstructive Sleep Apnea
Published on: December 6, 2016
Satisfaction and safety using dexmedetomidine or propofol sedation during endoscopic oesophageal procedures: A
Susanne Eberl1, Benedikt Preckel, Jacques J Bergman
1From the Department of Anaesthesiology (SE, BP, MWH), Department of Gastroenterology & Hepatology (JJB), and Clinical Research Unit, Academic Medical Centre, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands (SVD).
Background:
Dexmedetomidine possesses anxiolytic and hypnotic properties without respiratory side-effects, making it theoretically an ideal sedative agent for endoscopic procedures.
Objective:
We aimed to compare satisfaction and safety among outpatients receiving sedation with dexmedetomidine or propofol for endoscopic oesophageal procedures.
Design:
A randomised controlled study.
Setting:
Endoscopic intervention suite at the Academic Medical Centre in Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Participants:
Patients aged at least 18 years, and American Society of Anesthesiologists' physical status 1 to 3.
Intervention:
Total 63 patients were randomised to receive either dexmedetomidine (D) or propofol (P). Pain was treated with alfentanil in both groups.
Main Outcome Measures:
The primary outcomes were patients' and endoscopists' satisfaction levels measured by validated questionnaires (1 = very dissatisfied; 7 = highly satisfied). A secondary outcome was safety, determined by blood pressure, heart rate and oxygen saturation during and after the procedure, and respiratory rate and noninvasive cardiac output during the procedure.
Results:
Satisfaction of patients [median (IQR); group D, 5.0 (3.75 to 5.75) vs. group P, 6.25 (5.3 to 6.5)] and satisfaction of gastroenterologists [group D, 5.0 (4.4 to 5.8) vs. group P, 6.0 (5.4 to 6.0)] were lower in group D (both P < 0.001). More patients in group D would not recommend this form of sedation to one of their friends (group D, 15 of 32 vs. group P, 1 of 31; P < 0.001). Total 30 min after the procedure, heart rate [group D, 60 bpm (52 to 69) vs. group P, 70 bpm (60 to 81), P = 0.031] and SBP group D, 112 mmHg (92 to 132) vs. group P, 120 mmHg (108 to 132); P = 0.013] were significantly lower after dexmedetomidine sedation. There were no other differences in safety between groups.
Conclusion:
Compared with propofol, sedation with dexmedetomidine resulted in less satisfaction, and caused prolonged haemodynamic depression after endoscopic oesophageal procedures.
Trial Registration:
ISRCTN Register (ISRCTN 68599804).
More Related Videos
05:43Topical Airway Anesthesia for Awake-endoscopic Intubation Using the Spray-as-you-go Technique with High Oxygen Flow
Published on: January 13, 2017
07:45Minimally Invasive Murine Laryngoscopy for Close-Up Imaging of Laryngeal Motion During Breathing and Swallowing
Published on: December 1, 2023
Related Concept Videos
Endoscopic Procedures I: Esophagogastroduodenoscopy
During an EGD, the endoscope can be used to:
Parenteral Anesthetics: Overview
Endoscopic Procedures V: ERCP
Patient...
Endoscopic Procedures IV: Sigmoidoscopy and Laproscopy
Sigmoidoscopy
Sigmoidoscopy is a diagnostic procedure that uses a flexible sigmoidoscope equipped with a light source and camera to examine the rectum and sigmoid colon. The procedure involves inserting the tube through the anus...
Skeletal Muscle Relaxants: Therapeutic Uses
Endoscopic Procedures III: Video Capsule Endoscopy