Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Frustration and Conflict: Approach-Approach, Approach-Avoidance01:20

Frustration and Conflict: Approach-Approach, Approach-Avoidance

666
Frustration occurs when people are obstructed or prevented from achieving a desired goal or fulfilling a perceived need. For example, when someone's input is ignored in a discussion, it can lead to feelings of frustration. Conflict, however, arises from opposing interests, goals, or actions. Conflicts can take various forms based on the nature of these opposing desires or goals.
One common type of conflict is the Approach–Approach Conflict. In this case, a person faces two desirable...
666
Frustration and Conflict: Avoidance-Avoidance, Double-Approach Avoidance01:14

Frustration and Conflict: Avoidance-Avoidance, Double-Approach Avoidance

820
Avoidance-avoidance conflict refers to a psychological situation where a person must choose between two or more unpleasant alternatives. These conflicts are particularly stressful because neither option is desirable. This dilemma is often expressed in sayings like "caught between a rock and a hard place" or "between the devil and the deep blue sea." For instance, individuals who fear dental procedures may find themselves torn between enduring a painful toothache or facing the...
820
Self-Discrepancy Theory02:45

Self-Discrepancy Theory

19.0K
One influential perspective on what motivates people's behavior is detailed in Tory Higgin's self-discrepancy theory (Higgins, 1987). He proposed that people hold disagreeing internal representations of themselves that lead to different emotional states.  
19.0K
Avoidance Learning and Learned Helplessness01:14

Avoidance Learning and Learned Helplessness

3.6K
Avoidance learning and learned helplessness are critical concepts in understanding behavioral responses to negative stimuli.
Avoidance learning occurs when an organism learns that a specific behavior can prevent an unpleasant outcome. For example, a student who receives a bad grade may start studying harder to avoid future poor grades. This behavior persists even when the negative outcome is no longer present. Avoidance learning is powerful because it maintains behavior in the absence of the...
3.6K
Optimal Foraging00:48

Optimal Foraging

14.2K
How animals obtain and eat their food is called foraging behavior. Foraging can include searching for plants and hunting for prey and depends on the species and environment.
14.2K
Decision Making: P-value Method01:09

Decision Making: P-value Method

7.1K
The process of hypothesis testing based on the P-value method includes calculating the P- value using the sample data and interpreting it.
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is proposed. The claim is based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to the claim  is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses:  a null hypothesis would be a neutral statement while the alternative hypothesis can...
7.1K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Stereo-electroencephalography-guided cross-electrode radiofrequency thermocoagulation in focal epilepsy: A review of current methodologies and outcomes.

Epilepsia·2026
Same author

Travelling through time and space in working memory.

Memory & cognition·2026
Same author

Timing for Starting Antiseizure Medication Withdrawal After Epilepsy Surgery in Adults.

Neurology·2026
Same author

Radiofrequency Thermocoagulation Lesion Characteristics Using the Cross-Bonding Stereoelectroencephalography Electrode Technique in an in vitro Model.

Stereotactic and functional neurosurgery·2025
Same author

Neuroimaging abnormalities in functional/dissociative seizures: a meta-analysis.

Neuroscience and biobehavioral reviews·2025
Same author

Testing a Computational Model of Interruptions: The Effects of Time Pressure on Interruption and Response Decisions.

Human factors·2025
Same journal

Grateful leaders and attentive followers: How grateful attention transmits the cascade of gratitude expressions to strengthen coworker relationships.

The Journal of applied psychology·2026
Same journal

Scoring employment interviews with large language models: Evaluation design components, validity investigations, and best practice recommendations.

The Journal of applied psychology·2026
Same journal

A profile analysis of leader interpersonal emotion management strategies.

The Journal of applied psychology·2026
Same journal

A choice architecture intervention to increase diversity: Diverse defaults can counteract hiring discrimination.

The Journal of applied psychology·2026
Same journal

Transformational leadership in context: A meta-analysis of 40 years of research.

The Journal of applied psychology·2026
Same journal

Organizations espousing an authenticity ideology repel stigmatized job seekers.

The Journal of applied psychology·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Mar 24, 2026

Investigating Pain-Related Avoidance Behavior using a Robotic Arm-Reaching Paradigm
09:00

Investigating Pain-Related Avoidance Behavior using a Robotic Arm-Reaching Paradigm

Published on: October 3, 2020

4.6K

Departures from optimality when pursuing multiple approach or avoidance goals.

Timothy Ballard1, Gillian Yeo1, Andrew Neal2

  • 1Business School, University of Western Australia.

The Journal of Applied Psychology
|March 11, 2016
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

People deviate from optimal decision-making when pursuing multiple goals. They exhibit risk aversion for approach goals and risk-seeking for avoidance goals, contrary to dynamic programming models.

More Related Videos

Task Interruption and Resumption Paradigm for Testing the Activation and Pursuit of an Abstract Thinking Goal
06:45

Task Interruption and Resumption Paradigm for Testing the Activation and Pursuit of an Abstract Thinking Goal

Published on: April 18, 2017

6.7K
The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies
08:24

The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies

Published on: August 25, 2023

1.3K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Mar 24, 2026

Investigating Pain-Related Avoidance Behavior using a Robotic Arm-Reaching Paradigm
09:00

Investigating Pain-Related Avoidance Behavior using a Robotic Arm-Reaching Paradigm

Published on: October 3, 2020

4.6K
Task Interruption and Resumption Paradigm for Testing the Activation and Pursuit of an Abstract Thinking Goal
06:45

Task Interruption and Resumption Paradigm for Testing the Activation and Pursuit of an Abstract Thinking Goal

Published on: April 18, 2017

6.7K
The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies
08:24

The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies

Published on: August 25, 2023

1.3K

Area of Science:

  • Decision Science
  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Behavioral Economics

Background:

  • Understanding human decision-making in complex situations with multiple objectives is crucial.
  • Existing models often assume rational, optimal choices, but human behavior frequently deviates.
  • Prospect theory offers insights into risk preferences influencing choices under uncertainty.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate how individuals depart from optimality when pursuing multiple goals.
  • To test predictions derived from prospect theory regarding risk preferences in approach and avoidance goal pursuit.
  • To compare human prioritization decisions against a dynamic programming model of optimality.

Main Methods:

  • Operationalized optimality using dynamic programming for multistage decisions.
  • Employed an experimental paradigm where participants made prioritization decisions.
  • Participants pursued either two approach goals or two avoidance goals in a series of choices.

Main Results:

  • Confirmed that individuals are risk-averse when pursuing approach goals, prioritizing the best-positioned goal more than optimal.
  • Confirmed that individuals are risk-seeking when pursuing avoidance goals, prioritizing the worst-positioned goal more than optimal.
  • Demonstrated systematic deviations from dynamic programming predictions in both goal pursuit types.

Conclusions:

  • Human multiple-goal pursuit systematically deviates from normative optimal strategies.
  • Prospect theory's concepts of risk aversion and risk seeking effectively explain these deviations.
  • Integrating decision-making theories with normative models enhances understanding of complex goal pursuit.