Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 24, 2026

08:34
Proton Therapy Delivery and Its Clinical Application in Select Solid Tumor Malignancies
Published on: February 6, 2019
21.3K
A comparison study on various low energy sources in interstitial prostate brachytherapy
Mahdi Bakhshabadi1, Mahdi Ghorbani2, Mohsen Khosroabadi1
1Faculty of Medicine, North Khorasan University of Medical Sciences, Bojnurd, Iran.
Journal of Contemporary Brachytherapy
|March 18, 2016
Summary
Iodine-125 (125I), Palladium-103 (103Pd), and Cesium-131 (131Cs) brachytherapy sources were compared for prostate cancer treatment. Cesium-131 offers higher initial dose, while Palladium-103 provides better tumor targeting. Iodine-125 is advantageous due to its longer half-life.
Area of Science:
- Medical Physics
- Radiation Oncology
- Nuclear Medicine
Background:
- Low-energy sources are standard in prostate brachytherapy.
- Iodine-125 (125I) is a widely used source.
- Cesium-131 (131Cs) is a newer low-energy brachytherapy source.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the dose distributions of 125I, 103Pd, and 131Cs sources in prostate brachytherapy.
- Evaluate the efficacy of different radioactive seeds for interstitial prostate brachytherapy.
Main Methods:
- Monte Carlo simulation (MCNPX) was used to model 125I, 103Pd, and 131Cs brachytherapy sources.
- Simulations used identical geometries for all sources, with specific gamma spectra for each.
- Dose rates and isodose curves were analyzed in a prostate phantom.
Main Results:
- Cesium-131 (131Cs) delivered a higher absolute dose to the tumor compared to 125I and 103Pd at the same air kerma strength and time.
- Palladium-103 (103Pd) showed a higher relative dose rate within the tumor and a lower relative dose rate outside the tumor.
- Dose profiles were analyzed along transverse and longitudinal axes, both inside and outside the simulated prostate tumor.
Conclusions:
- Cesium-131 (131Cs) offers an advantage due to its higher initial absolute dose rate (cGy/(h·U)).
- Palladium-103 (103Pd) is advantageous for its superior tumor targeting (higher relative dose inside, lower relative dose outside).
- Iodine-125 (125I) remains a strong option due to its longer half-life, potentially offering advantages in total delivered dose.

