Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Bonferroni Test01:10

Bonferroni Test

3.5K
The Bonferroni test is a statistical test named after Carlo Emilio Bonferroni, an Italian mathematician best known for Bonferroni inequalities. This statistical test is a type of multiple comparison test to determine which means are different than the rest. Bonferroni test can minimize the Type 1 error by reducing the significance level alpha, which otherwise increases with sample pairs.
The means of different samples are first paired in all possible combinations.
The null hypothesis of the...
3.5K
Statistical Hypothesis Testing01:16

Statistical Hypothesis Testing

7.1K
Hypothesis testing is a critical statistical procedure facilitating informed, evidence-based decisions. It begins with a hypothesis, which is a tentative explanation, or a prediction about a population parameter. This hypothesis can be either a null hypothesis (H0), indicating no effect or difference, or an alternative hypothesis (Ha), suggesting an effect or difference.
Statistical significance measures the probability that an observed result occurred by chance. If this probability, known as...
7.1K
Accuracy and Errors in Hypothesis Testing01:13

Accuracy and Errors in Hypothesis Testing

672
Hypothesis testing is a fundamental statistical tool that begins with the assumption that the null hypothesis H0 is true. During this process, two types of errors can occur: Type I and Type II. A Type I error refers to the incorrect rejection of a true null hypothesis, while a Type II error involves the failure to reject a false null hypothesis.
In hypothesis testing, the probability of making a Type I error, denoted as α, is commonly set at 0.05. This significance level indicates a 5%...
672
Friedman Two-way Analysis of Variance by Ranks01:21

Friedman Two-way Analysis of Variance by Ranks

554
Friedman's Two-Way Analysis of Variance by Ranks is a nonparametric test designed to identify differences across multiple test attempts when traditional assumptions of normality and equal variances do not apply. Unlike conventional ANOVA, which requires normally distributed data with equal variances, Friedman's test is ideal for ordinal or non-normally distributed data, making it particularly useful for analyzing dependent samples, such as matched subjects over time or repeated measures...
554
Multiple Comparison Tests01:13

Multiple Comparison Tests

4.6K
Multiple comparison test, abbreviated as MCT, is a post hoc analysis generally performed after comparing multiple samples with one or more tests. An MCT will help identify a significantly different sample among multiple samples or a factor among multiple factors.
It would be easy to compare two samples using a significance alpha level of 0.05. In other words, there is only one sample pair to be compared. However, it would be difficult to identify a significantly different sample if the number...
4.6K
Statistical Inference Techniques in Hypothesis Testing: Parametric Versus Nonparametric Data01:16

Statistical Inference Techniques in Hypothesis Testing: Parametric Versus Nonparametric Data

571
Statistical inference techniques, paramount in hypothesis testing, differentiate into two broad categories: parametric and nonparametric statistics.
Parametric statistics, as the name suggests, assumes that data follow a specific distribution, often a normal distribution. This assumption enables robust hypothesis testing and estimation. Parametric methods, like the Student's t-test or Goodness-of-fit test, are frequently employed in biostatistics due to their robustness. For instance,...
571

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same authorSame journal

Finding distributions that differ, with false discovery rate control.

Biometrika·2026
Same author

Constrained Design of a Binary Instrument in a Partially Linear Model.

Observational studies·2026
Same author

EFFICIENT AND MULTIPLY ROBUST RISK ESTIMATION UNDER GENERAL FORMS OF DATASET SHIFT.

Annals of statistics·2026
Same author

Target identification and assessment in the era of AI.

Nature reviews. Drug discovery·2026
Same author

Toward actionable interventions in human aging (12th ARDD meeting, 2025).

Aging·2026
Same author

Recommendations for biomarker data collection in clinical trials by longevity biotechnology companies.

npj aging·2025
Same journal

Individualized dynamic latent factor model for multi-resolutional data with application to mobile health.

Biometrika·2026
Same journal

Functional principal component analysis forsparse censored data.

Biometrika·2026
Same journal

Sequential Gibbs posteriors with applications to principal component analysis.

Biometrika·2026
Same journal

Comparing causal parameters with many treatments and positivity violations.

Biometrika·2026
Same journal

Leveraging External Data for Testing Experimental Therapies with Biomarker Interactions in Randomized Clinical Trials.

Biometrika·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Mar 23, 2026

Problem-Solving Before Instruction PS-I: A Protocol for Assessment and Intervention in Students with Different Abilities
10:26

Problem-Solving Before Instruction PS-I: A Protocol for Assessment and Intervention in Students with Different Abilities

Published on: September 11, 2021

4.5K

Optimal multiple testing under a Gaussian prior on the effect sizes.

Edgar Dobriban1, Kristen Fortney2, Stuart K Kim2

  • 1Department of Statistics, Stanford University, Stanford, California 94305, U.S.A.

Biometrika
|April 6, 2016
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This study introduces an efficient algorithm for large-scale frequentist multiple testing, integrating Bayesian prior information to enhance power and discover new genetic loci in genome-wide association studies.

Keywords:
Genome-wide association studyMultiple testingNonconvex optimizationWeighted Bonferroni methodp-value weighting

More Related Videos

Author Spotlight: Evaluating the Adjuvant Efficacy and Safety of Angong Niuhuang Pill in Viral Encephalitis Treatment
08:36

Author Spotlight: Evaluating the Adjuvant Efficacy and Safety of Angong Niuhuang Pill in Viral Encephalitis Treatment

Published on: April 19, 2024

1.3K
Mapping Cortical Dynamics Using Simultaneous MEG/EEG and Anatomically-constrained Minimum-norm Estimates: an Auditory Attention Example
08:45

Mapping Cortical Dynamics Using Simultaneous MEG/EEG and Anatomically-constrained Minimum-norm Estimates: an Auditory Attention Example

Published on: October 24, 2012

15.3K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Mar 23, 2026

Problem-Solving Before Instruction PS-I: A Protocol for Assessment and Intervention in Students with Different Abilities
10:26

Problem-Solving Before Instruction PS-I: A Protocol for Assessment and Intervention in Students with Different Abilities

Published on: September 11, 2021

4.5K
Author Spotlight: Evaluating the Adjuvant Efficacy and Safety of Angong Niuhuang Pill in Viral Encephalitis Treatment
08:36

Author Spotlight: Evaluating the Adjuvant Efficacy and Safety of Angong Niuhuang Pill in Viral Encephalitis Treatment

Published on: April 19, 2024

1.3K
Mapping Cortical Dynamics Using Simultaneous MEG/EEG and Anatomically-constrained Minimum-norm Estimates: an Auditory Attention Example
08:45

Mapping Cortical Dynamics Using Simultaneous MEG/EEG and Anatomically-constrained Minimum-norm Estimates: an Auditory Attention Example

Published on: October 24, 2012

15.3K

Area of Science:

  • Statistics
  • Genetics
  • Bioinformatics

Background:

  • Multiple testing is crucial in large-scale studies like genome-wide association studies (GWAS).
  • Integrating prior information can improve statistical power but is challenging with frequentist methods.
  • Existing methods struggle with computational complexity when incorporating uncertain prior information.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop a novel method for large-scale frequentist multiple testing that effectively incorporates Bayesian prior information.
  • To optimize weighted Bonferroni methods by finding optimal weights that maximize average power.
  • To provide an efficient algorithm for discovering new loci in GWAS.

Main Methods:

  • Developed a new method for frequentist multiple testing using Bayesian prior information.
  • Formulated an optimization problem to find optimal [Formula: see text]-value weights for the weighted Bonferroni method.
  • Designed an efficient algorithm for Gaussian priors on effect sizes, guaranteeing near-exact optimal weights.
  • Utilized an open-source implementation for practical application.

Main Results:

  • The proposed method achieves optimal [Formula: see text]-value weights, maximizing average power.
  • The efficient algorithm overcomes the computational challenges of previous methods for uncertain priors.
  • Demonstrated the method's ability to discover new loci in genome-wide association studies.
  • Showcased favorable comparisons against existing competitor methods.

Conclusions:

  • The new method offers a powerful and efficient approach for large-scale frequentist multiple testing with Bayesian priors.
  • This technique enhances the discovery of genetic loci in GWAS.
  • The availability of an open-source implementation facilitates its adoption in the research community.