Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Reliability and Validity01:29

Reliability and Validity

14.3K
Reliability and validity are two important considerations that must be made with any type of data collection. Reliability refers to the ability to consistently produce a given result. In the context of psychological research, this would mean that any instruments or tools used to collect data do so in consistent, reproducible ways.
14.3K
Spearman's Rank Correlation Test01:20

Spearman's Rank Correlation Test

1.6K
Spearman's rank correlation test, also known as Spearman's rho, is a nonparametric method for assessing the strength and direction of association between two variables. This test is particularly valuable when the data distribution is unknown or when the assumption of normality does not hold. Named after the English psychologist and statistician Dr. Charles Edward Spearman, it serves as the nonparametric counterpart to Pearson's correlation coefficient.
Spearman's test calculates correlation by...
1.6K
Kendall's Coefficient of Concordance01:20

Kendall's Coefficient of Concordance

1.2K
Kendall's Coefficient of Concordance (W), also known as Kendall's W, is a non-parametric statistical measure used to assess the agreement or concordance between multiple raters or judges when they rank a set of items. It is often used when you have ordinal data (ranks) and you want to see if there is consistency or consensus among the raters. It is widely applied in research areas such as psychology, medicine, and social sciences, where multiple judges are asked to rank or rate subjects...
1.2K
Coefficient of Correlation01:12

Coefficient of Correlation

9.1K
The correlation coefficient, r, developed by Karl Pearson in the early 1900s, is numerical and provides a measure of strength and direction of the linear association between the independent variable x and the dependent variable y.
If you suspect a linear relationship between x and y, then r can measure how strong the linear relationship is.
What the VALUE of r tells us:
The value of r is always between –1 and +1: –1 ≤ r ≤ 1.
The size of the correlation r indicates the...
9.1K
Calibration Curves: Correlation Coefficient01:10

Calibration Curves: Correlation Coefficient

5.5K
In a linear calibration curve, there is a value called the calibration coefficient, denoted by 'r,' which measures the strength and the direction of association between two variables. The correlation coefficient value ranges from −1 to +1. A value of +1 indicates a perfect positive linear correlation, −1 denotes a perfect negative correlation, and 0 implies no correlation between the two variables. A positive correlation value establishes that as one variable increases, the...
5.5K
Theory of Attribution II: Kelley's Covariation Theory01:29

Theory of Attribution II: Kelley's Covariation Theory

868
Attribution theory plays a crucial role in social psychology, helping to explain how individuals interpret the causes of behavior. One prominent model within this field is Harold Kelley's covariation theory, which provides a systematic approach to determining whether internal traits or external circumstances drive a person's actions. The model posits that individuals rely on three key types of information—consensus, consistency, and distinctiveness—to make these judgments.Consensus:...
868

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

International spinal cord injury socio-demographic basic data set (version 1.0).

Spinal cord·2023
Same author

Long-Term Reliability and Validity of the AO Spine PROST (Patient-Reported Outcome Spine Trauma).

Spine·2022
Same author

Differences in Societal Participation Across Diagnostic Groups: Secondary Analyses of 8 Studies Using the Utrecht Scale for Evaluation of Rehabilitation-Participation.

Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation·2021
Same author

Comparison between EQ-5D-5L and PROMIS-10 to evaluate health-related quality of life 3 months after stroke: a cross-sectional multicenter study.

European journal of physical and rehabilitation medicine·2021
Same author

Reliability, validity and responsiveness of the Dutch version of the AOSpine PROST (Patient Reported Outcome Spine Trauma).

European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society·2020
Same author

Employment Among People With Spinal Cord Injury in 22 Countries Across the World: Results From the International Spinal Cord Injury Community Survey.

Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation·2020
Same journal

Promoting Client-Centered Communication in Rehabilitation: Strategies for Managing Difficult Conversations.

Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation·2026
Same journal

Multi-Domain Benefits of Exergaming for Sarcopenia Management in Institutionalized Older Adults: Physical, Psychological, and Social Outcomes.

Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation·2026
Same journal

Health Literacy During Inpatient Rehabilitation and Its Association with One-Year Health and Functional Outcomes in Individuals with Traumatic Spinal Cord Injury.

Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation·2026
Same journal

Apraxia in Patients with Cognitive Impairment: Evidence from Familiar Tool Use.

Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation·2026
Same journal

COMPARISON OF ULTRASOUND-GUIDED LAVAGE AND SUBACROMIAL BURSA INJECTION FOR CALCIFIC TENDINITIS: A PROSPECTIVE, RANDOMIZED, DOUBLE-BLIND TRIAL.

Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation·2026
Same journal

Neurogenic bowel dysfunction in multiple sclerosis: clinical determinants and its association with bladder dysfunction in a multicenter study.

Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Mar 22, 2026

Author Spotlight: Validation of SICOLE-R for Assessing Cognitive and Reading Skills in Spanish-Speaking Children and Its Role in Personalized Education
09:00

Author Spotlight: Validation of SICOLE-R for Assessing Cognitive and Reading Skills in Spanish-Speaking Children and Its Role in Personalized Education

Published on: August 16, 2024

1.3K

What to Do With "Moderate" Reliability and Validity Coefficients?

Marcel W Post1

  • 1University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Groningen; and Brain Center Rudolf Magnus and Center of Excellence in Rehabilitation Medicine, University Medical Center Utrecht and De Hoogstraat, Utrecht, The Netherlands.

Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
|April 21, 2016
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Clinimetric studies often accept low correlations for reliability and validity. However, this research argues for higher standards, suggesting lower thresholds indicate potential issues.

Keywords:
Outcome assessment (health care)PsychometricsRehabilitationValidation studies as topic

More Related Videos

Multimedia Battery for Assessment of Cognitive and Basic Skills in Mathematics BM-PROMA
10:58

Multimedia Battery for Assessment of Cognitive and Basic Skills in Mathematics BM-PROMA

Published on: August 28, 2021

5.1K
Isokinetic Robotic Device to Improve Test-Retest and Inter-Rater Reliability for Stretch Reflex Measurements in Stroke Patients with Spasticity
08:40

Isokinetic Robotic Device to Improve Test-Retest and Inter-Rater Reliability for Stretch Reflex Measurements in Stroke Patients with Spasticity

Published on: June 12, 2019

8.0K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Mar 22, 2026

Author Spotlight: Validation of SICOLE-R for Assessing Cognitive and Reading Skills in Spanish-Speaking Children and Its Role in Personalized Education
09:00

Author Spotlight: Validation of SICOLE-R for Assessing Cognitive and Reading Skills in Spanish-Speaking Children and Its Role in Personalized Education

Published on: August 16, 2024

1.3K
Multimedia Battery for Assessment of Cognitive and Basic Skills in Mathematics BM-PROMA
10:58

Multimedia Battery for Assessment of Cognitive and Basic Skills in Mathematics BM-PROMA

Published on: August 28, 2021

5.1K
Isokinetic Robotic Device to Improve Test-Retest and Inter-Rater Reliability for Stretch Reflex Measurements in Stroke Patients with Spasticity
08:40

Isokinetic Robotic Device to Improve Test-Retest and Inter-Rater Reliability for Stretch Reflex Measurements in Stroke Patients with Spasticity

Published on: June 12, 2019

8.0K

Area of Science:

  • Psychometrics
  • Measurement in Health Sciences

Background:

  • Clinimetric studies often accept correlation coefficients as low as .40 for test-retest reliability and convergent validity.
  • This practice is debated, with arguments suggesting moderate correlations (.40-.60) may not adequately support reliability or validity.

Discussion:

  • Reliability coefficients below .70 should be viewed as potentially indicating unreliability.
  • Convergent validity coefficients in the .40 to .70 range may signal validity problems or be inconclusive.
  • Study designs should aim for realistically high reliability and validity coefficients.

Key Insights:

  • Lower thresholds for reliability and validity in clinimetrics may be insufficient.
  • Re-evaluating accepted correlation coefficients is crucial for accurate measurement.
  • Robust study designs are essential for establishing meaningful psychometric properties.

Outlook:

  • Future clinimetric research should adopt more stringent criteria for reliability and validity.
  • Further investigation into optimal thresholds for correlation coefficients is warranted.
  • Promoting rigorous methodological standards will enhance the quality of health outcome measures.