Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 22, 2026

08:53
The Measurement of Unsteady Surface Pressure Using a Remote Microphone Probe
Published on: December 3, 2016
7.4K
Non-Contact Methods for Measuring Front Cavity Depths of Laboratory Standard Microphones Using a Depth-Measuring
Victor Nedzelnitsky1, Randall P Wagner1
1National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, MD 20899-8220.
Summary
Accurate microphone calibration requires precise measurement of front cavity depth (lfc). A gage block (GB) method using an optical microscope provides improved accuracy and reduced uncertainty, even with fewer measurements.
Area of Science:
- Acoustics
- Metrology
- Instrumentation
Background:
- Accurate primary calibration of laboratory standard (LS) microphones at high frequencies necessitates knowing the front cavity depth (lfc).
- Non-contact measurement methods are crucial to prevent damage to the microphone diaphragm during lfc determination.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate and compare non-contact optical measurement methods for determining the front cavity depth (lfc) of LS microphones.
- To identify the most accurate and reliable method for lfc measurement to improve microphone calibration uncertainty.
Main Methods:
- An optical depth-measuring microscope was used to measure lfc on six LS microphones of two types.
- Two primary methods were employed: direct measurement on the microphone annulus (D) and measurement using a gage block (GB) placed on the annulus.
- Plane-fitting data reduction techniques were utilized with the GB method to account for geometric imperfections.
Main Results:
- The gage block (GB) subsampling methods demonstrated excellent agreement with the full GB dataset results.
- GB subsampling methods yielded smaller expanded uncertainties compared to direct measurement (D) subsampling methods.
- Measurements using the GB subsampling method with only nine positions achieved expanded uncertainties within 4 μm (k=2).
Conclusions:
- The gage block (GB) subsampling method is preferred for measuring microphone front cavity depth due to its accuracy and reduced uncertainty.
- This method significantly improves the uncertainty of microphone calibrations compared to using nominal lfc values.
- The optical microscope and GB method offer a robust solution for precise lfc determination in microphone metrology.

