Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Minerals

Minerals

Minerals are essential nutrients that the human body needs in small amounts to work properly. They play a vital role in many bodily functions, such as building strong bones and transmitting nerve impulses. Some minerals are needed for hormone production or to maintain a normal heartbeat. Major minerals include calcium, phosphorus, potassium, sulfur, sodium, chlorine, and magnesium, while trace minerals include iron, manganese, copper, iodine, zinc, cobalt, fluoride, and selenium.

Major...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Sleep Regularity Index After Stroke: Change Over Time and Its Association With Recovery: A Longitudinal Observational Study.

Journal of the American Heart Association·2026

Same author

Using Compositional Data Analysis to Explore Movement Behaviors in People Who Have Experienced a Stroke.

Journal of neurologic physical therapy : JNPT·2026

Same author

Framework for artificial intelligence implementation research in healthcare: synthesizing current evidence on barriers and facilitators.

NPJ digital medicine·2026

Same author

WITHDRAWN: Geographic Variation in Pregnancy-Associated Overdose and Substance Use Disorder Mortality, 2016-2022.

medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences·2026

Same author

<i>Corynebacterium bovis</i> Surgical Site Infection and Abscess Formation: A Case Report.

Clinical case reports·2025

Same author

Supportive Care Needs of Patients with Breast Cancer Who Self-Identify as Black: An Integrative Review.

Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.)·2025

Same journal

<i>Escherichia coli</i> in water samples at Bhutan's National Food Testing Laboratory: baseline findings and scoping for antimicrobial resistance surveillance.

Journal of water and health·2026

Same journal

Socioeconomic and attitudinal predictors of bottled water use among lower-income households in Southwest Virginia.

Journal of water and health·2026

Same journal

Norovirus wastewater monitoring during a community outbreak investigation in Pennsylvania.

Journal of water and health·2026

Same journal

Potentially toxic elements in air and rainwater in Abidjan District: a health risk assessment.

Journal of water and health·2026

Same journal

From plant pathogen to public health tool: A review of tobamoviruses and their role in wastewater & environmental surveillance.

Journal of water and health·2026

Same journal

Assessing long-term specific pollutant loads in municipal wastewater plants influent using monitoring data: A case study from Latvia.

Journal of water and health·2026

See all related articles

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Mar 22, 2026

TD-DFT Guided Advanced E-Eye Sensing Technique for On-site Quantification of Fe, Cr, F, and As in the Environmental, Biological, and Food Samples

TD-DFT Guided Advanced E-Eye Sensing Technique for On-site Quantification of Fe, Cr, F, and As in the Environmental, Biological, and Food Samples

Published on: September 19, 2025

Arsenic from community water fluoridation: quantifying the effect.

Emily Peterson¹, Howard Shapiro², Ye Li²

¹Public Health Ontario, 300-480 University Ave., Toronto, ON, Canada, M5G 1V2

Journal of Water and Health

|April 23, 2016

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

Community water fluoridation is a safe public health practice. This study found that while water treatment reduces arsenic, fluoridation adds a minimal amount, well below safety standards.

More Related Videos

Removal of Trace Elements by Cupric Oxide Nanoparticles from Uranium In Situ Recovery Bleed Water and Its Effect on Cell Viability

Removal of Trace Elements by Cupric Oxide Nanoparticles from Uranium In Situ Recovery Bleed Water and Its Effect on Cell Viability

Published on: June 21, 2015

In Vitro Scratch Assay to Demonstrate Effects of Arsenic on Skin Cell Migration

In Vitro Scratch Assay to Demonstrate Effects of Arsenic on Skin Cell Migration

Published on: February 23, 2019

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Mar 22, 2026

TD-DFT Guided Advanced E-Eye Sensing Technique for On-site Quantification of Fe, Cr, F, and As in the Environmental, Biological, and Food Samples

TD-DFT Guided Advanced E-Eye Sensing Technique for On-site Quantification of Fe, Cr, F, and As in the Environmental, Biological, and Food Samples

Published on: September 19, 2025

Removal of Trace Elements by Cupric Oxide Nanoparticles from Uranium In Situ Recovery Bleed Water and Its Effect on Cell Viability

Removal of Trace Elements by Cupric Oxide Nanoparticles from Uranium In Situ Recovery Bleed Water and Its Effect on Cell Viability

Published on: June 21, 2015

In Vitro Scratch Assay to Demonstrate Effects of Arsenic on Skin Cell Migration

In Vitro Scratch Assay to Demonstrate Effects of Arsenic on Skin Cell Migration

Published on: February 23, 2019

Area of Science:

Environmental Science
Public Health
Toxicology

Background:

Community water fluoridation is a World Health Organization (WHO) recommended strategy for preventing dental caries.
Concerns exist regarding arsenic content in hydrofluorosilicic acid, the chemical used for water fluoridation, and its potential health risks.

Purpose of the Study:

To determine if water fluoridation contributes to increased arsenic levels in drinking water.
To quantify the additional arsenic associated with fluoridation.
To compare findings with established safety standards and existing research.

Main Methods:

Utilized surveillance data from Ontario drinking water systems.
Employed mixed effects linear regression to analyze the impact of fluoridation status on arsenic concentration differences.
Controlled for raw water arsenic, treatment processes, and source water type.

Main Results:

Water treatment generally reduced arsenic levels by 0.2 μg/L in both fluoridated and non-fluoridated systems.
Fluoridated systems showed an additional 0.078 μg/L of arsenic compared to non-fluoridated systems (P = 0.008).
This additional arsenic is less than 10% of the NSF/ANSI standard of 1 μg/L.

Conclusions:

Water fluoridation is associated with a small, quantifiable increase in arsenic levels.
The observed arsenic concentrations remain significantly below established safety limits.
Findings support informed decision-making regarding the safety of community water fluoridation programs.