Ranking Predatory Journals: Solve the Problem Instead of Removing It!

Area of Science:

• Scholarly publishing ethics
• Bibliometrics
• Research integrity

Background:

• Predatory journals pose a significant threat to scholarly publishing by disseminating fraudulent research.
• The proliferation of predatory journals necessitates effective strategies for identification and mitigation.
• Existing methods for identifying predatory journals require refinement to address the evolving landscape.

Purpose of the Study:

• To introduce a novel ranking approach for predatory journals.
• To provide a framework for editors to assess and improve their journals.
• To offer guidance for early-career researchers and editors in navigating predatory publishing practices.

Main Methods:

• The proposed ranking system is developed based on established criteria for identifying predatory journals (Beall's criteria).
• A case study is presented to illustrate the practical application and efficacy of the ranking methodology.
• The approach focuses on actionable steps for journal improvement and transformation.

Main Results:

• The ranking system offers a structured method to evaluate journals suspected of predatory practices.
• The approach facilitates the identification of areas for improvement within journals.
• The methodology provides a tool for distinguishing between legitimate and predatory publishing venues.

Conclusions:

• The developed ranking system offers a viable solution to the challenge of predatory journals in scholarly communication.
• Implementing this ranking approach can aid editors in enhancing journal quality and integrity.
• This framework empowers editors and researchers to safeguard against unethical publishing practices and promote trustworthy research dissemination.