Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Epistaxis01:30

Epistaxis

706
Epistaxis, or nosebleeds, occurs when small, swollen blood vessels in the nasal mucous membrane rupture. Typically, the anterior septum is the primary site of occurrence.
Etiology
Possible causes of this condition include high blood pressure, trauma, low humidity, upper respiratory tract infections, allergies, foreign bodies, nasal inhalation of corticosteroids or illicit drugs, excessive use of decongestant nasal sprays, facial or nasal surgery, anatomic malformation, tumors, or systemic...
706
Suctioning the Nasopharyngeal Airway01:29

Suctioning the Nasopharyngeal Airway

4.9K
Nasopharyngeal suctioning is a procedure to remove secretions from the upper part of the respiratory tract that the patient cannot clear independently. It helps maintain airway patency and prevents complications such as aspiration pneumonia.
Equipment Required
4.9K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Carving Out Change: Women Leading in Facial Plastic Surgery.

Facial plastic surgery & aesthetic medicine·2026
Same author

Developments in facial feminization surgery.

Current opinion in otolaryngology & head and neck surgery·2022
Same author

Preface.

Otolaryngologic clinics of North America·2022
Same author

Commentary on "Sex Differences in Adult Facial 3D Morphology: Application of Gender-Affirming Facial Surgery" by Bannister et al.

Facial plastic surgery & aesthetic medicine·2022
Same author

Opioid Prescription Patterns After Rhinoplasty.

JAMA facial plastic surgery·2019
Same author

A Closer Look at the Analgesic Regimen After Rhinoplasty-Reply.

JAMA facial plastic surgery·2018
Same journal

Clarification of a Suspension Technique for Unstable Nasal Bones.

JAMA facial plastic surgery·2019
Same journal

Functional Outcomes, Quantitative Morphometry, and Aesthetic Analysis of Articulated Alar Rim Grafts in Septorhinoplasty.

JAMA facial plastic surgery·2019
Same journal

Clarification of a Suspension Technique for Unstable Nasal Bones-Reply.

JAMA facial plastic surgery·2019
Same journal

Spontaneity Assessment in Dually Innervated Gracilis Smile Reanimation Surgery.

JAMA facial plastic surgery·2019
Same journal

Measuring Outcomes of Mohs Defect Reconstruction Using Eye-Tracking Technology.

JAMA facial plastic surgery·2019
Same journal

The Tripod Concept of the Upper Nasal Third.

JAMA facial plastic surgery·2019
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Mar 21, 2026

Endoscopic Septoplasty with Limited Two-line Resection: Minimally Invasive Surgery for Septal Deviation
06:13

Endoscopic Septoplasty with Limited Two-line Resection: Minimally Invasive Surgery for Septal Deviation

Published on: June 20, 2018

18.3K

A Staging System for Revision Rhinoplasty: A Review.

Regina Rodman1, Russell Kridel2

  • 1University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston.

JAMA Facial Plastic Surgery
|May 6, 2016
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Revision rhinoplasty presents challenges, prompting the development of a new staging system. The Problem, Graft, and Surgery (PGS) system classifies revision rhinoplasty difficulty to improve patient understanding and surgeon communication.

More Related Videos

A Postoperative Evaluation Guideline for Computer-Assisted Reconstruction of the Mandible
10:42

A Postoperative Evaluation Guideline for Computer-Assisted Reconstruction of the Mandible

Published on: January 28, 2020

7.1K
Quantitative Assessment Protocol for Facial Soft Tissue Volumetric Changes with Stereophotogrammetry
06:26

Quantitative Assessment Protocol for Facial Soft Tissue Volumetric Changes with Stereophotogrammetry

Published on: December 9, 2025

267

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Mar 21, 2026

Endoscopic Septoplasty with Limited Two-line Resection: Minimally Invasive Surgery for Septal Deviation
06:13

Endoscopic Septoplasty with Limited Two-line Resection: Minimally Invasive Surgery for Septal Deviation

Published on: June 20, 2018

18.3K
A Postoperative Evaluation Guideline for Computer-Assisted Reconstruction of the Mandible
10:42

A Postoperative Evaluation Guideline for Computer-Assisted Reconstruction of the Mandible

Published on: January 28, 2020

7.1K
Quantitative Assessment Protocol for Facial Soft Tissue Volumetric Changes with Stereophotogrammetry
06:26

Quantitative Assessment Protocol for Facial Soft Tissue Volumetric Changes with Stereophotogrammetry

Published on: December 9, 2025

267

Area of Science:

  • Plastic Surgery
  • Otolaryngology
  • Facial Plastic Surgery

Background:

  • Rhinoplasty is a complex cosmetic procedure with a significant revision rate (5-15%).
  • Existing literature lacks a standardized system for evaluating patients seeking revision rhinoplasty.
  • A systematic classification may improve treatment planning, prognosis assessment, and outcome evaluation.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To introduce a novel staging system for revision rhinoplasty, analogous to the TNM staging for malignant tumors.
  • To provide a systematic method for evaluating the complexity of revision rhinoplasty cases.
  • To enhance patient-surgeon communication and manage expectations regarding surgical outcomes.

Main Methods:

  • Development of the Problem, Graft, and Surgery (PGS) staging system.
  • P (Problem): Assesses the specific anatomical anomaly.
  • G (Graft): Quantifies the number of grafts required.
  • S (Surgery): Records the number of previous surgical procedures.
  • E (Expectations): Incorporates patient expectations after initial staging.

Main Results:

  • The PGS system offers a structured approach to classifying revision rhinoplasty complexity.
  • It provides a framework for understanding surgical limitations and potential outcomes.
  • The system facilitates clearer communication among surgeons specializing in revision rhinoplasty.

Conclusions:

  • The PGS staging system aids in understanding the complexity of revision rhinoplasty.
  • It helps manage patient expectations by defining achievable surgical results.
  • Standardization through PGS allows for better comparison of surgical techniques and outcomes.