Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 21, 2026

The Spatial Memory Game: Testing the Relationship Between Spatial Language, Object Knowledge, and Spatial Cognition
Published on: February 19, 2018
Frames of reference and categorical/coordinate spatial relations in a "what was where" task.
Francesco Ruotolo1,2, Tina Iachini3, Gennaro Ruggiero3
1Helmholtz Institute, Experimental Psychology, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands. f.ruotolo@uu.nl.
People use egocentric and allocentric spatial references differently based on object type and task. 3D objects favor egocentric coordinate judgments, while 2D figures favor categorical judgments.
Area of Science:
- Cognitive Psychology
- Neuroscience
- Spatial Cognition
Background:
- Understanding spatial cognition is crucial for explaining how humans navigate and interact with their environment.
- Two primary reference frames, egocentric (self-centered) and allocentric (environment-centered), are used to represent spatial information.
- Spatial information can be processed using coordinate (metric) or categorical (abstract) representations.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate how egocentric and allocentric reference frames are combined with coordinate and categorical spatial information.
- To determine how the dimensionality of stimuli (3D objects vs. 2D figures) influences the use of these spatial reference frames and information types.
- To examine the impact of immediate versus delayed responses on the accuracy of spatial judgments.
Main Methods:
- Participants memorized triads of 3D objects or 2D figures.
- Verbal judgments were collected for tasks involving egocentric and allocentric references, using both coordinate and categorical spatial information.
- Tasks included identifying objects based on proximity (coordinate) or relative position (categorical) to the self or another object.
- Response times were manipulated by including immediate recall and delayed recall (5s delay) conditions.
Main Results:
- 2D figures led to a preference for categorical judgments over coordinate judgments, regardless of the reference frame (egocentric or allocentric).
- 3D objects specifically favored egocentric coordinate judgments over allocentric ones.
- Egocentric judgments were more accurate than allocentric judgments under immediate recall conditions and when using 3D objects compared to 2D figures.
Conclusions:
- The findings suggest distinct processing pathways for different spatial reference frames and information types, influenced by stimulus dimensionality.
- Egocentric processing appears more robust for coordinate spatial information, particularly with 3D objects and immediate recall.
- The results align with theories positing specific functional roles for egocentric and allocentric frames in visuospatial processing.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Coordinate Plane
Coordinates and Map Projections
Polar and Cylindrical Coordinates
Depth Perception and Spatial Vision
Position and Displacement
Inertial Frames of Reference

