Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Automatic Processing and Automatic Social Behavior01:28

Automatic Processing and Automatic Social Behavior

310
Automatic processing refers to the cognitive operations that occur without conscious intent or awareness, playing a fundamental role in shaping social cognition and behavior. These processes enable individuals to navigate complex social environments efficiently by relying on mental shortcuts and pre-existing knowledge structures known as schemas. One of the most influential mechanisms underlying automatic processing is priming, which subtly activates mental representations through exposure to...
310
Framing Effects03:26

Framing Effects

8.0K
Information is everywhere and its presentation—such as how and when items are presented—can impact our perceptions and decisions surrounding the info. This broad concept umbrellas framing effects—influences that occur due to the way information is framed in its appearance, whether it’s purely the order or the specific wording of a message. Let’s take a look at numerous ways in which two versions of something can objectively say the same thing, yet we respond in...
8.0K
Support Reactions in Three Dimensions01:27

Support Reactions in Three Dimensions

1.8K
Support reactions in three dimensions help maintain the stability and equilibrium of various structures and systems. These reactions prevent the system from translating and rotating, ensuring the design can withstand external forces and perform its intended function efficiently and safely. Some of the supports providing support reactions in three dimensions are discussed below:
Ball and Socket Joint is one of the supports allowing free rotation about any axis. This freedom of rotation is...
1.8K
Social Facilitation01:04

Social Facilitation

36.7K
Not all intergroup interactions lead to negative outcomes. Sometimes, being in a group situation can improve performance. Social facilitation occurs when an individual performs better when an audience is watching than when the individual performs the behavior alone. This typically occurs when people are performing a task for which they are skilled.
36.7K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Words and Worlds Both: Dynamic Effects of Distributional and Sensorimotor Information in Semantic Processing.

Open mind : discoveries in cognitive science·2026
Same author

Effects of multisensory study on long-term memory for pictures and sounds.

Acta psychologica·2025
Same author

Study-test overlap rather than multisensory integration benefits memory.

Memory & cognition·2025
Same author

Non-native language comprehenders encode implied shapes of objects in memory.

Cortex; a journal devoted to the study of the nervous system and behavior·2024
Same author

NewAbstractConcepts: A Database of 42 Normed Abstract Concepts and Exemplars.

Journal of cognition·2024
Same author

Automatic mental simulation in native and non-native speakers.

Memory & cognition·2024

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Mar 21, 2026

Corticospinal Excitability Modulation During Action Observation
12:33

Corticospinal Excitability Modulation During Action Observation

Published on: December 31, 2013

9.4K

Alignment effects in beer mugs: Automatic action activation or response competition?

Sander A Roest1, Diane Pecher2, Lilian Naeije2

  • 1Department of Psychology, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Woudestein T13-50, P.O. Box 1738, 3000 DR, Rotterdam, The Netherlands. roest@fsw.eur.nl.

Attention, Perception & Psychophysics
|May 18, 2016
PubMed
Summary

Object handle orientation speeds responses when aligned with the hand used. This alignment effect is not due to automatic motor activation, suggesting other mechanisms are at play.

Keywords:
Choice-reaction taskGo/no-go taskSimon effectSpatial alignmentStimulus response compatibility

More Related Videos

Author Spotlight: A Novel Setup to Conduct Naturalistic Laboratory Experiments with Real Human Actors in Scenarios
07:43

Author Spotlight: A Novel Setup to Conduct Naturalistic Laboratory Experiments with Real Human Actors in Scenarios

Published on: August 4, 2023

2.8K
A Prediction Error-driven Retrieval Procedure for Destabilizing and Rewriting Maladaptive Reward Memories in Hazardous Drinkers
08:05

A Prediction Error-driven Retrieval Procedure for Destabilizing and Rewriting Maladaptive Reward Memories in Hazardous Drinkers

Published on: January 5, 2018

10.3K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Mar 21, 2026

Corticospinal Excitability Modulation During Action Observation
12:33

Corticospinal Excitability Modulation During Action Observation

Published on: December 31, 2013

9.4K
Author Spotlight: A Novel Setup to Conduct Naturalistic Laboratory Experiments with Real Human Actors in Scenarios
07:43

Author Spotlight: A Novel Setup to Conduct Naturalistic Laboratory Experiments with Real Human Actors in Scenarios

Published on: August 4, 2023

2.8K
A Prediction Error-driven Retrieval Procedure for Destabilizing and Rewriting Maladaptive Reward Memories in Hazardous Drinkers
08:05

A Prediction Error-driven Retrieval Procedure for Destabilizing and Rewriting Maladaptive Reward Memories in Hazardous Drinkers

Published on: January 5, 2018

10.3K

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Motor Control
  • Human-Computer Interaction

Background:

  • Object interaction responses are faster when the effector (e.g., hand) and object features (e.g., handle orientation) are spatially aligned.
  • This alignment effect has been hypothesized to stem from automatic motor program activation or response-level competition.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the underlying mechanisms of the object-handle alignment effect.
  • To differentiate between automatic motor activation and response competition explanations.

Main Methods:

  • Participants performed reach-and-grasp or reach-and-button-press actions with either their left or right hand.
  • Stimuli involved a beer mug with varying handle orientations presented in response to color cues.
  • A go/no-go task variation and upright/inverted object decisions were also employed to probe task relevance.

Main Results:

  • The alignment effect was consistent across different action types (reach-and-grasp vs. reach-and-button-press).
  • The alignment effect was eliminated in the go/no-go task, where a response was not always required.
  • Similar results were observed when object shape (upright/inverted) was task-relevant, indicating the effect is not specific to handle orientation.

Conclusions:

  • The findings suggest that the object-handle alignment effect is not driven by automatic motor activation of the responding limb.
  • The results support explanations involving response-level processes rather than direct, automatic motor preparation.
  • The alignment effect appears to depend on the requirement to select and execute a specific motor response.