Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 21, 2026

Author Spotlight: Advancing Protein Engineering – Harnessing Evolution Through PRANCE and Lab Automation
Published on: January 12, 2024
Coached Peer Review: Developing the Next Generation of Authors
Daniel Sidalak1, Eve Purdy, S Luckett-Gatopoulos
1D. Sidalak is a medical student, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada. E. Purdy is an emergency medicine resident, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada. S. Luckett-Gatopoulos is an emergency medicine resident, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada. H. Murray is associate professor of emergency medicine, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada. B. Thoma is clinical assistant professor of emergency medicine, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada. T. Chan is assistant professor of emergency medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Learner authors found coached peer review on the CanadiEM blog to be a positive and effective method for publishing high-quality medical education content, enhancing their academic writing skills.
Area of Science:
- Medical Education
- Academic Publishing
- Digital Health
Background:
- Learners face challenges in traditional academic publishing, with harsh peer review processes.
- Academic blogs offer alternative publishing avenues but often lack quality control.
- CanadiEM, an emergency medicine educational blog, sought to address these issues for learner-authors.
Purpose of the Study:
- To describe and evaluate a novel "coached peer review" process implemented on the CanadiEM blog.
- To facilitate the publication of high-quality academic materials by medical learners.
- To provide constructive feedback for developing academic writing skills.
Main Methods:
- A survey was conducted from February to June 2015.
- Participants included learner-authors and external expert reviewers involved in the coached peer review process.
- Reactions to the coached peer review process were collected and analyzed.
Main Results:
- Participants reported a positive perception of the coached peer review process.
- The process was described as friendly, easy, efficient, and transparent compared to traditional methods.
- Learner-authors experienced increased confidence in their published work.
Conclusions:
- The "coached peer review" model successfully met its goals for learner-authors.
- CanadiEM's approach enhances the quality of online educational resources.
- Promoting this model can inspire more high-quality academic writing from learners.
Related Concept Videos
The Scientific Method
Generally, predictions are tested using carefully-designed experiments. Based on the outcome of these...
The Scientific Method
The Scientific Method
Guidelines for Writing Outcome
Patient outcomes reflect the patient's response to the goal rather than what the nurse aims to achieve. Terminology should be observable and measurable to avoid the reader's interpretation. The desired outcome should be realistic and achievable in the designated care timeframe. Expected outcomes should align with adjunctive therapies. The outcome should enhance care...
Proofreading
Proofreading
Errors During Replication are Corrected by the DNA Polymerase...

