A Validation of the Group-Based Medical Mistrust Scale in Formerly Incarcerated Black and Latino Men

Pamela Valera1, Javier F Boyas2, Camila Bernal1

  • 11 Columbia University, New York, NY, USA.

Insights

This study validates a tool to measure medical mistrust in formerly incarcerated Black and Latino men. Findings show discrimination and suspicion are key factors in their mistrust of healthcare systems.

Area of Science:

  • Public Health
  • Health Disparities
  • Medical Sociology

Background:

  • Medical mistrust is a significant public health concern, yet research on formerly incarcerated Black and Latino men is limited.
  • Understanding their mistrust of medical providers and institutions is crucial, given potential links to criminal justice system experiences.
  • Assessing medical mistrust is vital for addressing health and health behaviors in this population.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To validate and assess the psychometric properties of the Group-Based Medical Mistrust Scale.
  • To adapt the scale for use among formerly incarcerated Black and Latino men in New York City.

Main Methods:

  • Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses were employed.
  • The Group-Based Medical Mistrust Scale was psychometrically evaluated.

Main Results:

  • A two-factor structure demonstrated the best fit for the data.
  • Discrimination and suspicion emerged as significant subscales.
  • The validated scale proved to be a reliable tool for assessing medical mistrust.

Conclusions:

  • The two-factor Group-Based Medical Mistrust Scale is a valid and reliable instrument.
  • It can effectively discern levels of medical mistrust among formerly incarcerated Black and Latino men.
  • Findings highlight the importance of addressing discrimination and suspicion in healthcare settings for this population.

Related Concept Videos

Surveys02:16

Surveys

Often, psychologists develop surveys as a means of gathering data. Surveys are lists of questions to be answered by research participants, and can be delivered as paper-and-pencil questionnaires, administered electronically, or conducted verbally. Generally, the survey itself can be completed in a short time, and the ease of administering a survey makes it easy to collect data from a large number of people.
17.2K
Stereotypes, Prejudice, and Discrimination02:55

Stereotypes, Prejudice, and Discrimination

Humans are very diverse and although we share many similarities, we also have many differences. The social groups we belong to help form our identities (Tajfel, 1974). These differences may be difficult for some people to reconcile, which may lead to prejudice toward people who are different. Prejudice is a negative attitude and feeling toward an individual based solely on one’s membership in a particular social group (Allport, 1954; Brown, 2010). Prejudice is common against people who...
95.9K
The Stanford Prison Experiment03:20

The Stanford Prison Experiment

The famous and controversial Stanford Prison Experiment, conducted by social psychologist Philip Zimbardo and his colleagues at Stanford University, demonstrated the power of social roles, social norms, and scripts.
25.0K
Ethics in Research01:56

Ethics in Research

Today, scientists agree that good research is ethical in nature and is guided by a basic respect for human dignity and safety. However, this has not always been the case. Modern researchers must demonstrate that the research they perform is ethically sound.
26.1K
Obedience01:08

Obedience

According to obedience research, we may harm others under the forceful pressures of an authority figure (Milgram, 1974). How about if the inappropriate orders were delivered with less force? The increasing interdependence between nurses and physicians compelled Hofling and his colleagues to explore nurses’ reactions to a potentially harmful medical request made by the perceived authority figure, the doctor (Hofling, Brotzman, Dalrymple, Graves, & Pierce, 1966). In this situation,...
35.7K
Bias in Epidemiological Studies01:29

Bias in Epidemiological Studies

Biases can arise at various stages of research, from study design and data collection to analysis and interpretation. Recognizing and addressing these biases is essential to ensure the validity and reliability of epidemiological findings.Broadly speaking, biases in epidemiology fall into three main categories: selection bias, information bias, and confounding. A more detailed description of possible biases is:  
1.5K