Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 20, 2026

11:05
Knowledge Based Cloud FE Simulation of Sheet Metal Forming Processes
Published on: December 13, 2016
12.7K
Critical length scale controls adhesive wear mechanisms
Ramin Aghababaei1, Derek H Warner2, Jean-Francois Molinari1
1Institute of Civil Engineering, Institute of Materials Science and Engineering, Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL), CH 1015 Lausanne, Switzerland.
Nature Communications
|June 7, 2016
Summary
Adhesive wear mechanisms are unified by revealing a critical length scale transition. This reconciles differing observations and enables physics-based wear prediction, advancing mechanics understanding.
Area of Science:
- Mechanics
- Materials Science
- Tribology
Background:
- Adhesive wear, a fundamental tribological process, is poorly understood.
- Current adhesive wear prediction relies on empirical models with limited applicability.
- The exact mechanism by which contacting surface asperities generate wear particles remains elusive.
Purpose of the Study:
- To reconcile discrepant observations and predictions of adhesive wear mechanisms.
- To develop a unified framework for understanding adhesive wear.
- To advance physics-based wear prediction models.
Main Methods:
- Atomistic simulations utilizing model interatomic potentials.
- Formulation of a simple analytic model.
- Comparison of simulation results with experimental data.
Main Results:
- A transition in the asperity wear mechanism was identified at a critical contact junction length scale.
- Discrepant wear observations were reconciled into a unified framework.
- An analytic model was developed to predict this transition.
Conclusions:
- The study provides a unified understanding of adhesive wear mechanisms.
- The findings enable the development of physics-based wear laws, reducing reliance on empirical coefficients.
- This research facilitates expanded use of computational modeling in wear process exploration.
Related Concept Videos
Abrasion Resistance of Concrete
683
Abrasion resistance is an essential characteristic of concrete that determines its durability and longevity under various wear conditions. Concrete surfaces are vulnerable to different types of abrasion. For instance, surfaces may wear down due to the constant movement of vehicles or be eroded by solids carried in water, as seen in concrete canal linings. Specific tests are conducted to measure the abrasion resistance of concrete.
One such test is the revolving disc test, where three plates...
One such test is the revolving disc test, where three plates...
683
Rolling Resistance
736
When a solid cylinder rolls steadily on a rigid surface, the normal force applied by the surface on the cylinder is perpendicular to the tangent at the contact point. However, since no materials are entirely rigid, the surface's reaction to the cylinder involves a range of normal pressures.
For instance, imagine a hard cylinder rolling on a comparatively soft surface. The cylinder's weight compresses the surface beneath it. As the cylinder moves, the material in front of it slows down due to...
For instance, imagine a hard cylinder rolling on a comparatively soft surface. The cylinder's weight compresses the surface beneath it. As the cylinder moves, the material in front of it slows down due to...
736
Design Example: Deciding Thickness of Lubricating Fluid in a Shaft
376
Effective lubrication between a rotating shaft and its bearing housing is essential in rotating machinery to minimize friction, wear, and energy loss. With carefully controlled thickness and viscosity, the lubricant layer prevents metal-to-metal contact, ensuring smooth operation.
To calculate the required thickness of the lubricant layer, the tangential velocity at the shaft's surface must first be determined. This velocity is calculated by converting the rotational speed to angular velocity...
To calculate the required thickness of the lubricant layer, the tangential velocity at the shaft's surface must first be determined. This velocity is calculated by converting the rotational speed to angular velocity...
376

