Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Inertial Frames of Reference01:03

Inertial Frames of Reference

9.6K
Newton’s first law is usually considered to be a statement about reference frames. It provides a method for identifying a special type of reference frame: the inertial reference frame. In principle, we can make the net force on a body zero. If its velocity relative to a given frame is constant, then that frame is said to be inertial. So, by definition, an inertial reference frame is a reference frame where Newton's first law holds valid. Newton's first law applies to objects with...
9.6K
Relative Motion Analysis using Rotating Axes-Problem Solving01:29

Relative Motion Analysis using Rotating Axes-Problem Solving

822
Consider a crane whose telescopic boom rotates with an angular velocity of 0.04 rad/s and angular acceleration of 0.02 rad/s2. Along with the rotation, the boom also extends linearly with a uniform speed of 5 m/s. The extension of the boom is measured at point D, which is measured with respect to the fixed point C on the other end of the boom. For the given instant, the distance between points C and D is 60 meters.
Here, in order to determine the magnitude of velocity and acceleration for point...
822
Relative Motion Analysis using Rotating Axes01:25

Relative Motion Analysis using Rotating Axes

1.0K
Consider a component AB undergoing a linear motion. Along with a linear motion, point B also rotates around point A. To comprehend this complex movement, position vectors for both points A and B are established using a stationary reference frame.
However, to express the relative position of point B relative to point A, an additional frame of reference, denoted as x'y', is necessary. This additional frame not only translates but also rotates relative to the fixed frame, making it...
1.0K
Non-inertial Frames of Reference01:27

Non-inertial Frames of Reference

8.1K
A reference frame accelerating or decelerating relative to an inertial frame is a non-inertial frame. To help understand this, consider what taking off in an airplane, turning a corner in a car, riding a merry-go-round, and the circular motion of a tropical cyclone all have in common. All these systems are accelerating, decelerating, or rotating relative to the Earth; hence, they all are non-inertial frames. All these systems exhibit inertial forces, which merely seem to arise from motion,...
8.1K
Three-Dimensional Force System:Problem Solving01:30

Three-Dimensional Force System:Problem Solving

1.5K
A three-dimensional force system refers to a scenario in which three forces act simultaneously in three different directions. This type of problem is commonly encountered in physics and engineering, where it is necessary to calculate the resultant force on the system, which can then be used to predict or analyze the behavior of the object or structure under consideration.
To solve a three-dimensional force system, first resolve each force into its respective scalar components. Do this using...
1.5K
Relative Velocity in Two Dimensions01:11

Relative Velocity in Two Dimensions

9.3K
Relative velocity is the velocity of an object as observed from a particular reference frame, or the velocity of one reference frame with respect to another reference frame. The concept of relative velocity can be used to describe motion in two dimensions. Consider a particle P and two reference frames S and S′. The position of the origin of S′ as measured in S is , the position of P as measured in S′ is , and the position of P as measured in S is , which can be evaluated by utilizing...
9.3K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Understanding 3D vision as a policy network.

Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences·2022
Same author

Route selection in non-Euclidean virtual environments.

PloS one·2021
Same author

No single, stable 3D representation can explain pointing biases in a spatial updating task.

Scientific reports·2019
Same journal

The microlandscapes of tree trunks: the effect of lichen and tree-level characteristics on arthropod communities.

Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences·2026
Same journal

Centimetre-scale landscapes to assess the motion behaviour and cognition of gastropods and bivalves.

Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences·2026
Same journal

Intertidal microcosms of wave-swept rocky shores: ecological and physiological insights from a uniquely stressful environment.

Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences·2026
Same journal

Temporal and spatial variation in temperature and oxygen at the microscale: key niche axes for aquatic life.

Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences·2026
Same journal

Natural microcosms in ecology: fulfilling the promise of model systems?

Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences·2026
Same journal

Microbe-induced galls and plant defence: metabolite crosstalk in a co-evolutionary battle.

Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Mar 19, 2026

Author Spotlight: Insights into the Analysis of Human Interaction with 3D Virtual Objects
06:36

Author Spotlight: Insights into the Analysis of Human Interaction with 3D Virtual Objects

Published on: October 18, 2024

1.5K

A moving observer in a three-dimensional world.

Andrew Glennerster1

  • 1School of Psychology and Clinical Language Sciences, University of Reading, Reading RG6 7BE, UK a.glennerster@reading.ac.uk.

Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences
|June 9, 2016
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

The brain may not need complex 3D reconstructions for visual tasks. Alternative methods, like storing surface properties, could enable object retrieval without egocentric or world-based frames.

Keywords:
motion parallaxmoving observerscene representationstereopsisthree-dimensional visionvisual stability

More Related Videos

MPI CyberMotion Simulator: Implementation of a Novel Motion Simulator to Investigate Multisensory Path Integration in Three Dimensions
09:46

MPI CyberMotion Simulator: Implementation of a Novel Motion Simulator to Investigate Multisensory Path Integration in Three Dimensions

Published on: May 10, 2012

13.2K
Controlled Rotation of Human Observers in a Virtual Reality Environment
09:11

Controlled Rotation of Human Observers in a Virtual Reality Environment

Published on: April 21, 2022

3.1K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Mar 19, 2026

Author Spotlight: Insights into the Analysis of Human Interaction with 3D Virtual Objects
06:36

Author Spotlight: Insights into the Analysis of Human Interaction with 3D Virtual Objects

Published on: October 18, 2024

1.5K
MPI CyberMotion Simulator: Implementation of a Novel Motion Simulator to Investigate Multisensory Path Integration in Three Dimensions
09:46

MPI CyberMotion Simulator: Implementation of a Novel Motion Simulator to Investigate Multisensory Path Integration in Three Dimensions

Published on: May 10, 2012

13.2K
Controlled Rotation of Human Observers in a Virtual Reality Environment
09:11

Controlled Rotation of Human Observers in a Virtual Reality Environment

Published on: April 21, 2022

3.1K

Area of Science:

  • Visual perception
  • Computational neuroscience
  • 3D vision

Background:

  • Object retrieval requires spatial representation across different viewpoints.
  • Computer vision excels at 3D scene reconstruction, but this may not reflect biological processes.
  • Understanding 3D vision is crucial for explaining how observers interact with their environment.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To challenge the necessity of complex 3D coordinate frames in human vision.
  • To explore biologically plausible alternatives for spatial representation.
  • To reframe the study of 3D vision, focusing on dynamic scene stability.

Main Methods:

  • Discussion of biologically plausible alternative representations.
  • Analysis of how surface properties influence visual feature movement.
  • Consideration of dynamic head and eye movements in visual processing.

Main Results:

  • Argues against the ease and necessity of building full 3D world models in the brain.
  • Proposes that surface properties (distance, slant, local shape) can guide visual perception.
  • Suggests that storing these propensities avoids the need for explicit 3D frames.

Conclusions:

  • The brain may use simpler mechanisms than full 3D reconstruction for spatial tasks.
  • Representing visual feature movement propensities offers a viable alternative.
  • Studying stable scene representation during movement is key to understanding 3D vision.