Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Nursing Process for Patient and Caregiver Teaching III: Evaluation and Documentation01:20

Nursing Process for Patient and Caregiver Teaching III: Evaluation and Documentation

2.7K
Evaluation of the teaching process enables the nurse to determine if the patient's learning needs were met and if training was effective. If the expected outcomes are not met, the care plan is revised, and additional education or reinforcement is provided. Nurses can ask questions after the session or obtain feedback to assess the patient's understanding of the topic.
Nurses can use several methods to evaluate patient outcomes. For example, oral questions can assess cognitive learning,...
2.7K
Nursing Process for Patient and Caregiver Teaching I: Assessment and Diagnosis01:24

Nursing Process for Patient and Caregiver Teaching I: Assessment and Diagnosis

2.6K
The nursing process provides a clinical decision-making framework for patients and families to establish and implement a personalized care plan. Since part of the nurse's duties is to teach patients, the steps of the nursing process are the most effective way to approach instruction. The nursing process and the teaching-learning process are inextricably linked.
It is critical to determine the patient's learning needs during the assessment. Determination of learning needs compounds data...
2.6K
Nursing Evaluation01:15

Nursing Evaluation

4.6K
The evaluation stage signals the end of the nursing process. The nurse gathers evaluative data to assess whether or not the patient has attained the expected results. Whereas the nurse collects data in the nursing assessment to identify the patient's health concerns, the evaluation stage data determines if the indicated health issues are resolved. Evaluative data collection includes two sections: the data acquired to evaluate patient outcomes and the time criteria for data collection.
4.6K
Nursing Assessment01:29

Nursing Assessment

9.7K
The two sources for collecting information are primary and secondary. After gathering information, interpretation and validation help to complete the data. The purpose of assessment is to establish data with the initial information, to interpret data about the patient's perceived needs and health problems, and to respond to these problems identified.
The nurse collects all aspects of the patient's health in the initial assessment, establishing priorities for ongoing focused assessments...
9.7K
Documentation in Long-Term and Home Healthcare Setting01:29

Documentation in Long-Term and Home Healthcare Setting

1.6K
Documentation in long-term care facilities and home healthcare settings is crucial for ensuring continuous, coordinated, and comprehensive care for patients. Each setting has its specific documentation processes and tools:
Long-Term Care Facilities
1.6K
Assessment of Respiration01:23

Assessment of Respiration

2.2K
The respiratory system's basic structures and primary functions lay the foundation for nurses' comprehensive respiratory assessments. This assessment includes subjective and objective data to gauge the patient's respiratory health.
Subjective Assessment: Nurses interview the patient to gather information directly during the subjective assessment. It includes questions about the individual's medical history, medications, and symptoms, focusing on past respiratory conditions like...
2.2K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Benchmarking doses to inform optimisation of radiological protection for verification imaging in radiotherapy.

International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics·2026
Same author

Variant classification for mucopolysaccharidosis type I; ACMG/AMP specification for IDUA from the ClinGen lysosomal diseases variant curation expert panel.

Molecular genetics and metabolism·2026
Same author

Defining Roles in Pediatric Palliative Care: Perspectives From Oncology and Palliative Care Teams.

Pediatric blood & cancer·2026
Same author

Whose Voice is it Anyway? <i>Artificial Intelligence and the New Crisis of Authenticity in Medical Education</i>.

Perspectives on medical education·2026
Same author

A qualitative study exploring the pros and cons of universal pediatric palliative care referral at diagnosis for children with cancer.

Palliative & supportive care·2026
Same author

Novel Genetic Risk Factor Identified for L-Asparaginase-Induced Pancreatitis in Pediatric Patients With Cancer.

Pediatric blood & cancer·2026
Same journal

Women's Conferences in Medicine: Advancing Gender Equity in Medical Education.

The clinical teacher·2026
Same journal

Entrusting Attention: An Additional lens on Entrustable Professional Activity Assessment.

The clinical teacher·2026
Same journal

Students as Teachers (SAT) and Educators: An Online Elective in Medical Education.

The clinical teacher·2026
Same journal

Beyond Student Proactivity in Surgical Placements.

The clinical teacher·2026
Same journal

Recentring Student Learning Within Professionalism Assessment: The Role of Structured Reflection in UK Medical Education.

The clinical teacher·2026
Same journal

The Six R's of Management Reasoning for Subintern Education.

The clinical teacher·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Mar 18, 2026

Multimodal Protocol for Assessing Metacognition and Self-Regulation in Adults with Learning Difficulties
12:55

Multimodal Protocol for Assessing Metacognition and Self-Regulation in Adults with Learning Difficulties

Published on: September 27, 2020

9.3K

Learning environment: assessing resident experience.

Anna Byszewski1, Heather Lochnan2, Donna Johnston3

  • 1Division of Geriatrics, Department of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.

The Clinical Teacher
|June 29, 2016
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

The Learning Environment for Professionalism (LEP) survey is a feasible tool for assessing postgraduate training environments. It identified areas like altruism and derogatory remarks needing attention, influencing future professionalism assessments.

More Related Videos

Using Learning Outcome Measures to assess Doctoral Nursing Education
10:07

Using Learning Outcome Measures to assess Doctoral Nursing Education

Published on: June 21, 2010

19.6K
Assessing the Multiple Dimensions of Engagement to Characterize Learning: A Neurophysiological Perspective
13:57

Assessing the Multiple Dimensions of Engagement to Characterize Learning: A Neurophysiological Perspective

Published on: July 1, 2015

13.3K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Mar 18, 2026

Multimodal Protocol for Assessing Metacognition and Self-Regulation in Adults with Learning Difficulties
12:55

Multimodal Protocol for Assessing Metacognition and Self-Regulation in Adults with Learning Difficulties

Published on: September 27, 2020

9.3K
Using Learning Outcome Measures to assess Doctoral Nursing Education
10:07

Using Learning Outcome Measures to assess Doctoral Nursing Education

Published on: June 21, 2010

19.6K
Assessing the Multiple Dimensions of Engagement to Characterize Learning: A Neurophysiological Perspective
13:57

Assessing the Multiple Dimensions of Engagement to Characterize Learning: A Neurophysiological Perspective

Published on: July 1, 2015

13.3K

Area of Science:

  • Medical Education
  • Professionalism Assessment

Background:

  • Academic institutions require formal assessment of the learning environment (LE) for professional identity development.
  • The Learning Environment for Professionalism (LEP) survey, previously validated for undergraduates, offers a practical solution.
  • LEP is a short, anonymous survey focused on rotation settings, assessing both positive and negative professionalism behaviors iteratively.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To test the feasibility of implementing the LEP survey in postgraduate programs.
  • To establish the validity and reliability of the LEP survey in a postgraduate setting.

Main Methods:

  • The study involved residents from four postgraduate programs completing 187 LEP ratings.
  • Ratings were collected at the end of 11 different rotations.
  • The survey assessed the learning environment based on professionalism behaviors.

Main Results:

  • A high resident response rate of 87% was achieved.
  • Ratings for program and rotation environments were similar but not identical.
  • Lower ratings were observed for displays of altruism and instances of derogatory comments, indicating areas for improvement.

Conclusions:

  • The LEP survey is a feasible and valid instrument for iterative assessment of the learning environment in postgraduate settings.
  • Specific areas, namely derogatory remarks and altruism, received the lowest scores and require institutional attention.
  • Further implementation across diverse programs is planned to fully assess reliability and potentially influence other institutions.