Jove
Visualize
Contact Us

Related Experiment Videos

[Selection for education in 1986].

K B Kristiansen, A Rancke-Madsen

    Ugeskrift for Laeger
    |May 29, 1989
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Scientific societies use central committees to select applicants for teaching roles, with appointment rates varying widely. Transparency in selection processes is recommended to prevent nepotism and guide students effectively.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    [Births in Denmark 1990].

    Ugeskrift for laeger·1992
    Same author

    [Legally induced abortions in 1990].

    Ugeskrift for laeger·1992
    Same author

    [Frequency of cesarean section in Denmark during 1980-1989].

    Ugeskrift for laeger·1991
    Same author

    [Selection for education in internal medicine in 1987].

    Ugeskrift for laeger·1989
    Same author

    [Appointment of women physicians in education].

    Ugeskrift for laeger·1989
    Same author

    [Prevention of secondary cases of meningococcal disease].

    Ugeskrift for laeger·1983
    Same journal

    [Mosaicism as a cause of Cowden syndrome].

    Ugeskrift for laeger·2026
    Same journal

    [Thyrotoxic crisis with cardiogenic shock].

    Ugeskrift for laeger·2026
    Same journal

    [Mindfulness-based cognitive therapy in the treatment of depression].

    Ugeskrift for laeger·2026
    Same journal

    [Fitness].

    Ugeskrift for laeger·2026
    Same journal

    [Risk of developing cataract related to fluoroscopy].

    Ugeskrift for laeger·2026
    Same journal

    [Obturator hernia with small bowel ileus presenting as hip pain in an elderly woman].

    Ugeskrift for laeger·2026
    See all related articles
    JoVE
    x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
    ABOUT JoVE
    OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
    AUTHORS
    Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
    LIBRARIANS
    TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
    RESEARCH
    JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
    EDUCATION
    JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
    Terms & Conditions of Use
    Privacy Policy
    Policies

    Area of Science:

    • Medical Education
    • Academic Administration
    • Scientific Workforce

    Context:

    • In 1986, a questionnaire surveyed scientific societies regarding their administrative organization for selecting applicants for academic teaching appointments.
    • This study examines the processes and applicant qualifications within various medical specialties.

    Purpose:

    • To present information on the administrative organization involved in selecting applicants for teaching appointments.
    • To detail the qualifications of applicants for academic positions in 1986.
    • To identify variations in selection processes and outcomes across different scientific specialties.

    Summary:

    • Fourteen specialties utilized central assessment committees for applicant selection.
    • Teaching appointment rates for qualified applicants ranged from 11% to 100% across specialties.

    Related Experiment Videos

  • Average postgraduate seniority for selected applicants was 6.9 years, with an average of 4 to 16 published scientific articles.

    • Impact:

    • Highlights the need for greater transparency in academic selection processes to mitigate concerns about nepotism.
    • Provides insights into the criteria and seniority levels for academic appointments in scientific fields.
    • Aims to offer guidance to students pursuing academic careers by clarifying selection standards.