Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 18, 2026

Establishing a Competing Risk Regression Nomogram Model for Survival Data
Published on: October 23, 2020
Underprotection of Unpredictable Statistical Lives Compared to Predictable Ones.
Marc Lipsitch1, Nicholas G Evans2, Owen Cotton-Barratt3
1Center for Communicable Disease Dynamics, Department of Epidemiology and Department of Immunology and Infectious Diseases, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA.
Greater care is often given to predictable statistical lives than unpredictable ones, despite no ethical basis. This disparity, particularly for low-probability risks, represents a market failure needing policy intervention.
Area of Science:
- Ethics
- Risk Analysis
- Public Policy
Background:
- Ethical discussions often differentiate between identified and statistical lives.
- Limited attention has been paid to varying care levels for different types of statistical lives.
Purpose of the Study:
- To explore the differential care given to predictable versus unpredictable statistical lives.
- To argue for ethical parity in protecting statistical lives, regardless of predictability.
Main Methods:
- Conceptual analysis of ethical frameworks concerning risk and statistical lives.
- Examination of statistical challenges in estimating low probabilities.
- Analysis of institutional and economic incentives influencing risk perception.
Main Results:
- Predictable statistical lives often receive greater protection than unpredictable ones, even with equal numbers at stake.
- Underestimation of low probabilities and rational incentives contribute to this disparity.
- Societal aggregation can render individually unpredictable risks predictable.
Conclusions:
- There is no ethical justification for treating unpredictable statistical lives differently from predictable ones.
- The underprotection of unpredictable statistical lives constitutes a market failure.
- Policy interventions such as regulation or compulsory insurance may be necessary to address this failure.
Related Concept Videos
Censoring Survival Data
Actuarial Approach
Consider the example of a high-risk surgical procedure with significant early-stage mortality. A two-year clinical study is conducted,...
Unusual Results
According to the range rule of thumb, any value above or below two standard deviations, 2σ from the mean, μ is considered unusual.
Maximum unusual value =...
Assumptions of Survival Analysis
Testing a Claim about Population Proportion
There are two methods of testing a claim about a population proportion: (1) Using the sample proportion from the data where a binomial distribution is approximated to the normal distribution and (2) Using the binomial probabilities calculated from the data.
The first method uses normal distribution as an approximation to the binomial distribution. The requirements are as follows: sample size is large...
Introduction To Survival Analysis
The primary goal of survival analysis is to estimate survival time—the time...

