Jove
Visualize
Contact Us

Related Concept Videos

Relationship Formation02:12

Relationship Formation

46.3K
What do you think is the single most influential factor in determining with whom you become friends and whom you form romantic relationships? You might be surprised to learn that the answer is simple: the people with whom you have the most contact. This most important factor is proximity. You are more likely to be friends with people you have regular contact with. For example, there are decades of research that shows that you are more likely to become friends with people who live in your dorm,...
46.3K
Impact of Schemas01:30

Impact of Schemas

254
Schemas are cognitive structures that provide a framework for interpreting and organizing social information. They help individuals navigate complex environments by offering expectations about people, events, and behaviors. Schemas influence attention, encoding, and retrieval processes, thereby shaping the entire trajectory of information processing in social contexts.Attention and Cognitive LoadDuring initial attention, schemas function as filters that prioritize schema-consistent information,...
254
Theory of Romantic Attachment in Adulthood03:34

Theory of Romantic Attachment in Adulthood

50.1K
Attachment is a long-standing connection or bond with others. While Attachment Theory was conceived in developmental psychology to describe infant-caregiver bonding, it's been extended into adulthood to include romantic relationships. 
50.1K
Desirable Characteristics in Others01:26

Desirable Characteristics in Others

176
Various factors, including the type of relationship, gender, and duration of the relationship, influence the perception of desirable characteristics in others. While certain traits such as trustworthiness, cooperativeness, agreeableness, and extraversion are universally valued across all relationships, other characteristics are context-dependent and gain prominence based on specific relational dynamics.Universal and Context-Dependent TraitsTrustworthiness and cooperativeness are fundamental...
176
How Data are Classified: Categorical Data01:11

How Data are Classified: Categorical Data

47.3K
A variable, usually notated by capital letters such as X and Y, is a characteristic or measurement that can be determined for each member of a population. Data are the actual values of variables. They may be numbers, or they may be words. Datum is a single value.
Data are classified based on whether they are measurable or not. Categorical data cannot be measured; instead, it can be divided into categories. For example, if Y denotes a person's party affiliation, some examples of Y include...
47.3K
Schemas01:42

Schemas

12.5K
A schema is a mental construct consisting of a cluster or collection of related concepts (Bartlett, 1932). There are many different types of schemata, and they all have one thing in common: schemata are a method of organizing information that allows the brain to work more efficiently. When a schema is activated, the brain makes immediate assumptions about the person or object being observed.
12.5K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Comparison helps children form broad explanations.

Child development·2026
Same author

The role of language in forming the concepts same and different.

Cognition·2026
Same author

ManyNumbers 3: A Multi-Lab Study of Demographic Correlates of Early Number Knowledge.

Developmental science·2026
Same author

Structural Alignment and Linguistic Contrast Help Children Learn a Key Principle of Spatial Construction.

Cognitive science·2025
Same author

Children's Early Spontaneous Comparisons Predict Later Analogical Reasoning Skills: An Investigation of Parental Influence.

Open mind : discoveries in cognitive science·2023
Same author

Spatial alignment supports comparison of life science images.

Journal of experimental psychology. Applied·2023
Same journal

EXPRESS: Age-related Differences in Recognition Memory for Discourse: The Case of Modified Words, Competitors, and Related Lures.

Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006)·2026
Same journal

EXPRESS: Exaggerated Self-Referencing in Body Dysmorphic Disorder.

Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006)·2026
Same journal

EXPRESS: Post-Error Adjustments: The role of Response Stimulus Intervals and error placement.

Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006)·2026
Same journal

Mitigating the Low Prevalence Effect: Role of Removing Explicit "Target-Absent" Responses in Visual Search.

Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006)·2026
Same journal

Visual Selection Is Spatially Constrained During Working Memory Consolidation.

Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006)·2026
Same journal

Cross-Phoneme Generalisation of Dimension-Based Statistical Learning for Stop Voicing: Probing Subject Design and Word Frame Effects.

Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006)·2026
See all related articles
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Mar 16, 2026

RBDT: A Computerized Task System based in Transposition for the Continuous Analysis of Relational Behavior Dynamics in Humans
11:09

RBDT: A Computerized Task System based in Transposition for the Continuous Analysis of Relational Behavior Dynamics in Humans

Published on: July 17, 2021

3.5K

Relational categories are more mutable than entity categories.

Jennifer Asmuth1, Dedre Gentner2

  • 1a Department of Psychology , Susquehanna University , Selinsgrove , PA , USA.

Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology (2006)
|August 4, 2016
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Relational concepts are less stable in memory than entity concepts because they are more semantically mutable in context. Memory for relational nouns is more impaired by context changes than for entity nouns.

Keywords:
MemoryNoun–verb differencesRelational categoriesRelational nounsSemantics

More Related Videos

Executing Complexity-Increasing Queries in Relational MySQL and NoSQL MongoDB and EXist Size-Growing ISO/EN 13606 Standardized EHR Databases
07:26

Executing Complexity-Increasing Queries in Relational MySQL and NoSQL MongoDB and EXist Size-Growing ISO/EN 13606 Standardized EHR Databases

Published on: March 19, 2018

9.8K
Creating Objects and Object Categories for Studying Perception and Perceptual Learning
14:38

Creating Objects and Object Categories for Studying Perception and Perceptual Learning

Published on: November 2, 2012

12.3K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Mar 16, 2026

RBDT: A Computerized Task System based in Transposition for the Continuous Analysis of Relational Behavior Dynamics in Humans
11:09

RBDT: A Computerized Task System based in Transposition for the Continuous Analysis of Relational Behavior Dynamics in Humans

Published on: July 17, 2021

3.5K
Executing Complexity-Increasing Queries in Relational MySQL and NoSQL MongoDB and EXist Size-Growing ISO/EN 13606 Standardized EHR Databases
07:26

Executing Complexity-Increasing Queries in Relational MySQL and NoSQL MongoDB and EXist Size-Growing ISO/EN 13606 Standardized EHR Databases

Published on: March 19, 2018

9.8K
Creating Objects and Object Categories for Studying Perception and Perceptual Learning
14:38

Creating Objects and Object Categories for Studying Perception and Perceptual Learning

Published on: November 2, 2012

12.3K

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Linguistics
  • Semantics

Background:

  • Distinction between relational categories (common relational patterns) and entity categories (common intrinsic properties).
  • Hypothesis that relational concepts are more semantically mutable and less stable in memory than entity concepts.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the memory stability of relational versus entity concepts.
  • To determine if contextual changes disproportionately affect memory for relational concepts.

Main Methods:

  • Three experiments comparing memory for entity and relational nouns.
  • Recognition memory tests with consistent versus changed contexts from encoding.
  • Controlled for abstractness-concreteness to isolate relationality effects.

Main Results:

  • Entity nouns showed better recognition accuracy than relational nouns.
  • Context change significantly impaired recognition of relational nouns more than entity nouns.
  • Findings were consistent even when controlling for abstractness.

Conclusions:

  • The contextual mutability of relational concepts is a core semantic property, not solely due to abstractness.
  • Relational concepts exhibit greater semantic mutability and reduced memory stability compared to entity concepts.
  • Implications for understanding lexical and conceptual structure, including referential versus predicate word functions.