Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 16, 2026

A Machine Learning Approach to Design an Efficient Selective Screening of Mild Cognitive Impairment
Published on: January 11, 2020
Minimax and admissible adaptive two-stage designs in phase II clinical trials
Guogen Shan1, Hua Zhang2, Tao Jiang3
1Epidemiology and Biostatistics Program, Department of Environmental and Occupational Health, School of Community Health Sciences, University of Nevada Las Vegas, Las Vegas, 89154, NV, USA.
Background:
Simon's two-stage design is the most widely implemented among multi-stage designs in phase II clinical trials to assess the activity of a new treatment in a single-arm study. In this two-stage design, the sample size from the second stage is fixed regardless of the number of responses observed in the first stage.
Methods:
We develop a new minimax adaptive design for phase II clinical trials, by using the branch-and-bound intelligent algorithm based on conditional error functions.
Results:
We compare the performance of the proposed design and competitors, including Simon's minimax design, and a modified Simon's design that allows early stopping for futility or efficacy. The maximum sample size of the proposed minimax adaptive design is guaranteed to be less than or equal to those from other existing designs. When the proposed design has the same maximum sample size as others, it always has the smallest expected sample size. In addition to the minimax adaptive design, we also introduce admissible adaptive designs determined from a Bayesian perspective.
Conclusions:
The proposed adaptive minimax design can save sample sizes for a clinical trial. The minimum required sample size is critical to reduce the cost of a project.
More Related Videos
04:53A Clinical Trial Assessing the Safety, Efficacy, and Delivery of Olive-Oil-Based Three-Chamber Bags for Parenteral Nutrition
Published on: September 20, 2019
14:05Behavioral Assessment of Hearing in 2 to 4 Year-old Children: A Two-interval, Observer-based Procedure Using Conditioned Play-based Responses
Published on: January 23, 2017
Related Concept Videos
Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Repeated Measures, Cross-Over, Carry-Over, and Latin Square Designs
Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Completely Randomized and Randomized Block Designs
Dosage Regimens: Designs and Approaches
Crossover Experiments
Crossover designs are performed even with smaller sample sizes since the samples can act as their controls. These are better than simple randomized trials since patients are exposed to all the treatments.
Bioavailability Study Design: Single Versus Multiple Dose Studies
Impact of Pharmacokinetic–Pharmacodynamic Models: Regulatory Decisions