Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 16, 2026

Measuring Local Anaphylaxis in Mice
Published on: October 14, 2014
Evaluation of Anaphylaxis Management in a Pediatric Emergency Department
Natasha Sidhu1, Stacie Jones, Tamara Perry
1From the Departments of *Pediatrics Emergency Medicine †Pediatric Allergy and Immunology, and ‡Biostatistics, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences and Arkansas Children Hospital, Little Rock, AR.
Insights
Provider adherence to anaphylaxis guidelines improved, particularly in using intramuscular epinephrine, after 2006. However, further education is needed for complete guideline implementation in pediatric emergency departments.
Area of Science:
- Pediatric Emergency Medicine
- Allergy and Immunology
- Clinical Practice Guidelines
Background:
- The National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases established evidence-based anaphylaxis treatment guidelines in 2006.
- Anaphylaxis management requires prompt and appropriate intervention.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate provider adherence to established anaphylaxis treatment guidelines.
- Assessed management practices in a tertiary care pediatric emergency department (ED).
Main Methods:
- Retrospective chart review of pediatric patients (0-18 years) treated for anaphylaxis from 2004-2011.
- Compared pre-guideline and post-guideline periods for epinephrine administration and follow-up.
- Utilized International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Edition codes for patient identification.
Main Results:
- Intramuscular (IM) epinephrine use increased significantly post-guideline (46% vs. 6%).
- 47% of patients received epinephrine in the ED; 31% via the preferred IM route.
- Discharge prescriptions for self-injectable epinephrine and allergy referrals showed no significant increase.
Conclusions:
- Provider use of IM epinephrine for anaphylaxis has improved following guideline publication.
- Enhanced provider education is necessary to achieve comprehensive guideline adherence in pediatric EDs.
Objective:
In 2006, the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Disease established evidence-based treatment guidelines for anaphylaxis. The purpose of our study was to evaluate provider adherence to guidelines-based management for anaphylaxis in a tertiary care pediatric emergency department (ED).
Methods:
Retrospective chart review was conducted of patients (0-18 years) presenting to the Arkansas Children Hospital ED from 2004 to 2011 for the treatment of anaphylaxis using International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Edition, codes. Multiple characteristics including demographics, clinical features, allergen source, and anaphylaxis management were collected. Fisher exact or χ tests were used to compare proportion of patients treated with intramuscular (IM) epinephrine in the preguideline versus postguideline period. Relative risk (RR) statistics were computed to estimate the ratio of patients who received self-injectable epinephrine prescription and allergy follow-up in the preguideline and postguideline groups.
Results:
A total of 187 patients (median [range] age, 7 [1-18] years; 67% male; 48% African American) were evaluated. Food (44%) and hymenoptera stings (22%) were commonly described culprit allergens, whereas 29% had no identifiable allergen. Only 47% (n = 87) received epinephrine in the ED and 31% (n = 27) via the preferred IM route. Comparing postguideline (n = 126) versus preguideline (n = 61) periods demonstrated increase in the usage of the IM route (46% postguideline vs 6% preguideline; risk ratio (RR), 7.64; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.04-46.0; P < 0.001). Overall, 61% (n = 115) of the patients received self-injectable epinephrine upon discharge, and there were no significant differences between the groups (64% postguideline vs 56% preguideline, P = 0.30). Postguideline patients were more likely to receive a prescription compared with preguideline patients (64% postguideline vs 56% preguideline; RR, 1.15; 95% CI, 0.89-1.55; P = 0.30). Only 45% (n = 85) received an allergy referral. Postguideline patients were more likely to receive an allergy referral than preguideline patients (48% postguideline vs 41% preguideline; RR, 1.16; 95% CI, 0.81-1.73; P = 0.40).
Conclusions:
Provider use of IM epinephrine has improved since anaphylaxis guidelines were published. However, more provider education is needed to improve overall adherence of guidelines in a tertiary care pediatric ED.
Related Concept Videos
Allergic Reactions: Anaphylaxis
Allergic Reactions
Adrenergic Agonists: Therapeutic Uses
Emergency and Intensive Care Unit (ICU) applications: Pressor agents increase blood pressure, heart rate, and contractility in shock and organ failure situations. Dopamine can induce vasodilation and stimulate adrenoceptors. Endogenous catecholamines are effective in treating cardiogenic shock. α2-agonists like clonidine can reverse anesthesia-induced hypertension.
Allergies and...
Asthma-IV: Diagnostic and Management
Clinical Assessment for Asthma:
This is the first step in diagnosing and managing asthma. It includes:
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation IV: Pharmacological Management
Asthma-IV: Nursing Management
First, in...

