Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 16, 2026

Author Spotlight: Advancing Early Detection and Treatment of Gastrointestinal Tumors
Published on: February 16, 2024
Risk factors associated with difficult gastric endoscopic submucosal dissection: predicting difficult ESD
Ji Ha Kim1, Hyeong Seok Nam1, Cheol Woong Choi2
1Department of Internal Medicine, Medical Research Institute, Pusan National University School of Medicine and Research Institute for Convergence of Biomedical Science and Technology, Pusan National University Yangsan Hospital, Beomeo-ri, Mulgeum-eup, Yangsan-si, Gyeongsangnam-do, 626-770, Korea.
Predicting difficult endoscopic submucosal dissections (ESD) is crucial for patient safety. Larger tumors, upper third locations, submucosal fibrosis, and invasive cancer increase ESD difficulty and complications.
Area of Science:
- Gastroenterology
- Endoscopic Surgery
- Oncology
Background:
- Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is a standard treatment for superficial gastric neoplasms.
- Difficult ESD cases can lead to complications like bleeding and perforation.
- Predicting and managing difficult ESD is essential for improving patient outcomes.
Purpose of the Study:
- To identify clinical, pathological, and endoscopic factors predicting difficult endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) procedures.
- To analyze the association between specific lesion characteristics and increased ESD complexity.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective review of 1052 endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) procedures.
- Difficult ESD defined by prolonged procedure time (≥60 min), piecemeal resection, incomplete resection (R1), or perforation.
- Multivariate analysis of clinical, pathological, and endoscopic findings.
Main Results:
- Larger tumor size (≥20 mm), upper third lesion location, submucosal fibrosis, and submucosal invasive cancer were independent risk factors for difficult ESD.
- These factors were associated with longer procedure times, piecemeal resections, incomplete resections, and perforation.
- En bloc and curative resection rates were high (93.3% and 92.4%, respectively).
Conclusions:
- Difficult ESD is significantly influenced by lesion size, location, submucosal fibrosis, and submucosal invasive cancer.
- Anticipating difficult ESD procedures allows for better preparation and consultation with experienced endoscopists.
- Proactive management of these factors can minimize complications and improve ESD success rates.
Related Concept Videos
Endoscopic Procedures I: Esophagogastroduodenoscopy
During an EGD, the endoscope can be used to:
Esophageal Strictures-I: Introduction
Etiology
The primary cause of esophageal strictures is long-standing gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), accounting for about 70 to 80% of adult cases. Chronic acid reflux can lead to injury and scarring of the esophageal lining, culminating in...
Peptic Ulcer Disease I: Introduction
An acute ulcer, marked by superficial erosion and minimal inflammation, swiftly resolves upon identifying and addressing the underlying cause. In contrast, a chronic ulcer persists, potentially eroding through the muscular wall and forming fibrous tissue.
Peptic ulcers can also be...
Endoscopic Procedures IV: Sigmoidoscopy and Laproscopy
Sigmoidoscopy
Sigmoidoscopy is a diagnostic procedure that uses a flexible sigmoidoscope equipped with a light source and camera to examine the rectum and sigmoid colon. The procedure involves inserting the tube through the anus...
Other Disorders of Digestive System
Esophageal Varices-I: Introduction
