Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 16, 2026

05:19
Practical Methodology of Cognitive Tasks Within a Navigational Assessment
Published on: June 1, 2015
14.1K
Evaluation of Accessibility Testing Methods. Which Methods Uncover What Type of Problems?
Aleksander Bai1, Heidi Camilla Mork1, Trenton Schulz1
1Norwegian Computing Center, Oslo, Norway.
Studies in Health Technology and Informatics
|August 19, 2016
Summary
Evaluating fourteen accessibility methods revealed that no single approach identifies all issues. Combining diverse methods is crucial for comprehensive accessibility assessments of digital solutions.
Area of Science:
- Human-Computer Interaction
- Usability Engineering
- Information Technology
Background:
- Accessibility evaluation is vital for digital solutions.
- Existing methods vary in resource and knowledge requirements.
- Classifying methods aids in selection and application.
Purpose of the Study:
- To categorize fourteen accessibility evaluation methods.
- To assess the effectiveness of diverse methods in identifying issues.
- To inform the selection of appropriate methods for future evaluations.
Main Methods:
- Categorized fourteen accessibility evaluation methods by resource needs and focus (technical vs. usable).
- Selected four distinct methods for evaluating an electronic identification (e-ID) solution.
- Identified and analyzed confusing and critical accessibility issues.
Main Results:
- Each of the four selected methods uncovered unique accessibility issues.
- Significant overlap in identified issues was observed across methods.
- No single method identified more than half of the total issues found.
Conclusions:
- A comprehensive approach combining multiple evaluation methods is necessary for thorough accessibility assessments.
- Method selection should align with specific project goals and available resources.
- Findings provide guidance for optimizing future accessibility evaluations.
Related Concept Videos
Accuracy and Errors in Hypothesis Testing
663
Hypothesis testing is a fundamental statistical tool that begins with the assumption that the null hypothesis H0 is true. During this process, two types of errors can occur: Type I and Type II. A Type I error refers to the incorrect rejection of a true null hypothesis, while a Type II error involves the failure to reject a false null hypothesis.
In hypothesis testing, the probability of making a Type I error, denoted as α, is commonly set at 0.05. This significance level indicates a 5%...
In hypothesis testing, the probability of making a Type I error, denoted as α, is commonly set at 0.05. This significance level indicates a 5%...
663
Decision Making: Traditional Method
5.7K
The process of hypothesis testing based on the traditional method includes calculating the critical value, testing the value of the test statistic using the sample data, and interpreting these values.
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is decided based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to this claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses, out of which a null hypothesis would be a...
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is decided based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to this claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses, out of which a null hypothesis would be a...
5.7K
Multiple Comparison Tests
4.5K
Multiple comparison test, abbreviated as MCT, is a post hoc analysis generally performed after comparing multiple samples with one or more tests. An MCT will help identify a significantly different sample among multiple samples or a factor among multiple factors.
It would be easy to compare two samples using a significance alpha level of 0.05. In other words, there is only one sample pair to be compared. However, it would be difficult to identify a significantly different sample if the number...
It would be easy to compare two samples using a significance alpha level of 0.05. In other words, there is only one sample pair to be compared. However, it would be difficult to identify a significantly different sample if the number...
4.5K

