Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 16, 2026

Author Spotlight: A Multi-Depth Porcine Model for Comprehensive Study of Burn Injuries and Healing Processes
Published on: February 23, 2024
Inter-facility transfer of pediatric burn patients from U.S. Emergency Departments
Sarah A Johnson1, Junxin Shi1, Jonathan I Groner2
1Center for Pediatric Trauma Research, The Research Institute at Nationwide Children's Hospital, 700 Children's Drive, Columbus, OH 43205, United States; Center for Injury Research and Policy, The Research Institute at Nationwide Children's Hospital, 700 Children's Drive, Columbus, OH 43205, United States.
Insights
Most pediatric burn patients in U.S. emergency departments meet American Burn Association referral criteria but are not transferred from low-volume hospitals. This suggests potential under-referral and missed opportunities for specialized burn care.
Area of Science:
- Pediatric Emergency Medicine
- Burn Epidemiology
- Healthcare Transfer Systems
Background:
- Emergency departments (EDs) manage a significant volume of pediatric burn injuries.
- American Burn Association (ABA) guidelines exist to standardize referral criteria for specialized burn care.
- Understanding transfer patterns is crucial for optimizing patient outcomes.
Purpose of the Study:
- To describe the epidemiology of pediatric burn patients in U.S. EDs.
- To identify factors associated with inter-facility transfer for these patients.
Main Methods:
- Analysis of the 2012 Nationwide Emergency Department Sample.
- Identification of pediatric burn patients meeting ABA referral criteria.
- Logistic models used to assess transfer odds from low-volume hospitals.
Main Results:
- An estimated 126,742 pediatric burn ED visits occurred in 2012.
- Over 54% of visits met ABA referral criteria, predominantly in low-volume hospitals.
- Only 8.2% of eligible patients were transferred from low-volume facilities; 98.3% treated and released.
Conclusions:
- The majority of pediatric burn patients meeting referral criteria are not transferred from low-volume EDs.
- A significant proportion of pediatric burn patients may be under-referred, potentially impacting clinical outcomes.
- Further investigation into referral practices is warranted to ensure optimal care.
Purpose:
To describe the epidemiology of pediatric burn patients seen in U.S. emergency departments (EDs) and to determine factors associated with inter-facility transfer.
Methods:
We analyzed data from the 2012 Nationwide Emergency Department Sample. Current American Burn Association (ABA) Guidelines were used to identify children <18 who met criteria for referral to burn centers. Burn patient admission volume was used as a proxy for burn expertise. Logistic models were fitted to examine the odds of transfer from low volume hospitals.
Results:
In 2012, there were an estimated 126,742 (95% CI: 116,104-137,380) pediatric burn ED visits in the U.S. Of the 69,003 (54.4%) meeting referral criteria, 83.2% were in low volume hospitals. Only 8.2% of patients meeting criteria were transferred from low volume hospitals. Of the 52,604 (95% CI: 48,433-56,775) not transferred, 98.3% were treated and released and 1.7% were admitted without transfer; 54.7% of burns involved hands.
Conclusions:
Over 90% of pediatric burn ED patients meet ABA burn referral criteria but are not transferred from low volume hospitals. Perhaps a portion of the 92% of patients currently receiving definitive care in low volume hospitals are under-referred and would have improved clinical outcomes if transferred at the time of presentation.
Related Concept Videos
Burn Injuries
The damage results in the death of skin cells, which can lead to a massive loss of fluid. Dehydration, electrolyte imbalance, and renal and circulatory failure follow, which can be fatal. Burn patients are treated with intravenous fluids to offset...
Pharmacokinetics in Pediatric Patients: Drug Metabolism
Drug Dosing: Infants and Children
Acute Kidney Injury V: Interprofessional Care
Pharmacokinetics in Pediatric Patients: Drug Excretion
Flail Chest-II
Assessment:
1. Clinical Evaluation:
History:

