Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 15, 2026

Qualitative and Quantitative Validation of Tools with Rating Scales Aimed at Assessing the Quality of University Service-Learning
Published on: August 29, 2025
Summative evaluation results and lessons learned from the Aligning Forces for Quality program.
Dennis P Scanlon1, Jeffrey A Alexander, Megan McHugh
1dpscanlon@psu.edu.
The Aligning Forces for Quality (AF4Q) initiative showed limited community-level improvements in healthcare quality compared to control groups. While some alliances achieved success, the program did not meet all its ambitious goals.
Area of Science:
- Healthcare quality improvement
- Public health initiatives
- Health services research
Background:
- The Robert Wood Johnson Foundation's Aligning Forces for Quality (AF4Q) initiative aimed to improve healthcare quality across communities nationwide.
- This program ran from 2005 to 2015, supporting 16 grantee alliances in implementing interventions across five key areas.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the summative results of the AF4Q initiative.
- To assess the impact of AF4Q interventions on community health and healthcare quality outcomes.
- To identify factors influencing program success and sustainability.
Main Methods:
- A longitudinal, mixed-methods program evaluation was conducted.
- 16 nonexperimentally selected grantee alliances across the US participated.
- Data were collected on quantitative outcomes related to the Triple Aim and qualitative aspects of intervention implementation and sustainability.
Main Results:
- No significant differences in longitudinal improvement rates were observed between AF4Q and control communities for most Triple Aim outcomes.
- Improvements were noted in both groups, with some exceptions in cost of care and population health.
- Significant heterogeneity existed in intervention scope and scale; no alliance fully implemented all five programmatic areas. Stakeholder engagement was initially successful but long-term sustainability and funding were challenging.
Conclusions:
- The AF4Q initiative did not achieve its overarching goals for community-level change but yielded localized successes.
- Variations in program impact were linked to differing acceptance of the initiative's theory of change, grantee capacity, local market contexts, and evolving program requirements.
- Lessons learned from AF4Q offer valuable insights for future regional health improvement efforts.
More Related Videos
05:47Simulation of a Scaled Assembly Process with Collaboration of a Robotic Arm and Monitoring through a Vision System for Quality Control
Published on: August 29, 2025
06:05The Participant-Reported Implementation Update and Score PRIUS: A Novel Method for Capturing Implementation-Related Data Over Time
Published on: February 19, 2021
Related Concept Videos
Impression Management Techniques III: Aligning Actions
Self-Evaluation Maintenance Model
Quality Assurance
Nursing Process for Patient and Caregiver Teaching III: Evaluation and Documentation
Nurses can use several methods to evaluate patient outcomes. For example, oral questions can assess cognitive learning,...
Guidelines for Writing Outcome
Patient outcomes reflect the patient's response to the goal rather than what the nurse aims to achieve. Terminology should be observable and measurable to avoid the reader's interpretation. The desired outcome should be realistic and achievable in the designated care timeframe. Expected outcomes should align with adjunctive therapies. The outcome should enhance care...
Nursing Evaluation