Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 14, 2026

05:54
Eye-tracking to Distinguish Comprehension-based and Oculomotor-based Regressive Eye Movements During Reading
Published on: October 18, 2018
6.8K
Attention and eye-movement control in reading: The selective reading paradigm
Eyal M Reingold1, Heather Sheridan2, Katie L Meadmore3
1Department of Psychology, University of Toronto at Mississauga.
Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception and Performance
|September 20, 2016
Summary
This study reveals that readers process distracting words less deeply than target words, especially when distractors are symbols. This finding offers new insights into reading and eye movement control.
Area of Science:
- Cognitive Psychology
- Neuroscience
- Linguistics
Background:
- Investigating covert attention and eye-movement control during reading is crucial for understanding cognitive processes.
- Existing models of reading often simplify the influence of distractors and parafoveal processing.
Purpose of the Study:
- To introduce a novel experimental paradigm for studying covert attention and eye-movement control in reading.
- To examine the processing depth of distractors versus target words and the impact of distractor type (words vs. symbols).
- To investigate the influence of preview validity on reading behavior.
Main Methods:
- Participants read sentences with interleaved target words (blue) and distractor strings (orange).
- Critical distractors (words or symbols) were placed before target words.
- Parafoveal processing (preview validity) was manipulated.
Main Results:
- Distractors underwent significantly shallower processing than target words, more so for symbol distractors.
- Distractor processing showed different patterns compared to normal reading regarding word frequency and fixation duration.
- Significant preview benefits were observed regardless of whether distractors were fixated or skipped.
- Preview effect magnitude was largely independent of distractor type, except when target and distractor were identical.
Conclusions:
- The novel paradigm effectively differentiates processing of targets and distractors.
- Findings challenge existing assumptions about eye movement control and attention during reading.
- The study provides a foundation for future research on reading mechanisms and attentional processes.

