Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Decision Making: Traditional Method01:14

Decision Making: Traditional Method

5.7K
The process of hypothesis testing based on the traditional method includes calculating the critical value, testing the value of the test statistic using the sample data, and interpreting these values.
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is decided based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to this claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses, out of which a null hypothesis would be a...
5.7K
Decision Making: P-value Method01:09

Decision Making: P-value Method

7.1K
The process of hypothesis testing based on the P-value method includes calculating the P- value using the sample data and interpreting it.
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is proposed. The claim is based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to the claim  is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses:  a null hypothesis would be a neutral statement while the alternative hypothesis can...
7.1K
Decision Making01:20

Decision Making

1.2K
Decision-making is a fundamental cognitive process that involves evaluating alternatives and selecting among them. This process can range from simple choices, such as deciding what to wear, to complex decisions, like choosing a major in college or a career path. The complexity of the decision often dictates the approach we use, which can be broadly categorized into two types: automatic and controlled decision-making.
Automatic decision-making is fast, intuitive, and relies on gut feelings...
1.2K
The Anchoring-and-Adjustment Heuristic01:25

The Anchoring-and-Adjustment Heuristic

7.8K
In order to make good decisions, we use our knowledge and our reasoning. Often, this knowledge and reasoning is sound and solid. However, sometimes, we are swayed by biases or by others manipulating a situation. For example, let’s say you and three friends wanted to rent a house and had a combined target budget of $1,600. The realtor shows you only very run-down houses for $1,600 and then shows you a very nice house for $2,000. Might you ask each person to pay more in rent to get the...
7.8K
Self-Presentation: Self-Monitoring and Self-Handicapping02:05

Self-Presentation: Self-Monitoring and Self-Handicapping

45.0K
People can go to great lengths to protect their self-image and present themselves in ways that they want others to see them. Sociologist Erving Goffman presented the idea that a person is like an actor on a stage. Calling his theory dramaturgy, Goffman believed that we use “impression management” to present ourselves to others as we hope to be perceived. Each situation is a new scene, and individuals perform different roles depending on who is present (Goffman, 1959). Think about...
45.0K
Protecting Self-Esteem01:27

Protecting Self-Esteem

266
Self-esteem, a central component of psychological well-being, is actively maintained through various cognitive and behavioral strategies. Individuals employ specific mechanisms to preserve a positive self-concept and mitigate threats to their self-worth, particularly in contexts involving social evaluation or personal feedback. Four primary techniques are commonly used to sustain self-esteem.Manipulating AppraisalsOne prominent strategy involves manipulating appraisals from others. Individuals...
266

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Green spot in 'WA 38': Growth dynamics, vascular integrity and architecture, and a hypothetical mechanism.

PloS one·2026
Same author

The structure of pairwise competition drives sudden regime shifts in a microbe-plasmid model.

Journal of the Royal Society, Interface·2026
Same author

Understanding the developmental trajectory of behavioral problems and subcortical structure morphometry in healthy children at 6 years old and long-term impact of early nutrition: the COGNIS study.

Child and adolescent psychiatry and mental health·2026
Same author

Learning the committor without collective variables.

Nature computational science·2026
Same author

Following the Committor Flow: A Data-Driven Discovery of Transition Pathways.

Journal of chemical theory and computation·2026
Same author

The relationship between psychological stress and cancer incidence: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Health psychology review·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Mar 14, 2026

Measuring the Subjective Value of Risky and Ambiguous Options using Experimental Economics and Functional MRI Methods
13:04

Measuring the Subjective Value of Risky and Ambiguous Options using Experimental Economics and Functional MRI Methods

Published on: September 19, 2012

12.5K

Modifying Evaluations and Decisions in Risky Situations.

Antonio Maldonado1, Sara Serra1, Andrés Catena1

  • 1Universidad de Granada(Spain).

The Spanish Journal of Psychology
|September 21, 2016
PubMed
Summary

This study reveals that urgent decisions in risky driving are faster and more cautious than risk evaluations. Feedback significantly enhances risk sensitivity and promotes safer choices, especially when emotionally charged.

Keywords:
drivingdual process modelfeedbackrisk perceptionrisk-taking

More Related Videos

Errors as a Means of Reducing Impulsive Food Choice
07:07

Errors as a Means of Reducing Impulsive Food Choice

Published on: June 5, 2016

9.3K
Experimental Research Examining How People Can Cope with Uncertainty Through Soft Haptic Sensations
09:07

Experimental Research Examining How People Can Cope with Uncertainty Through Soft Haptic Sensations

Published on: September 16, 2015

9.5K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Mar 14, 2026

Measuring the Subjective Value of Risky and Ambiguous Options using Experimental Economics and Functional MRI Methods
13:04

Measuring the Subjective Value of Risky and Ambiguous Options using Experimental Economics and Functional MRI Methods

Published on: September 19, 2012

12.5K
Errors as a Means of Reducing Impulsive Food Choice
07:07

Errors as a Means of Reducing Impulsive Food Choice

Published on: June 5, 2016

9.3K
Experimental Research Examining How People Can Cope with Uncertainty Through Soft Haptic Sensations
09:07

Experimental Research Examining How People Can Cope with Uncertainty Through Soft Haptic Sensations

Published on: September 16, 2015

9.5K

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Traffic Safety Research
  • Decision-Making Science

Background:

  • Risky driving behaviors pose significant public safety challenges.
  • Understanding the psychological underpinnings of risk perception and decision-making in traffic is crucial for developing effective interventions.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate how different types of feedback influence risk evaluation and risk-taking in simulated driving scenarios.
  • To differentiate between evaluative judgments of risk and urgent decision-making processes.

Main Methods:

  • Participants evaluated risky traffic situations and made urgent decisions (e.g., brake or not).
  • Experiments involved providing feedback on risky driving behaviors, with varying emotional content.
  • Independent effects of feedback and negative emotional stimuli were examined.

Main Results:

  • Urgent decisions were faster and more cautious than evaluative judgments, suggesting distinct processing systems.
  • Feedback significantly accelerated responses, increased risk sensitivity, and promoted more cautious behavior.
  • Emotional stimuli influenced decisions only when presented as feedback, not independently.

Conclusions:

  • Evaluative judgments and actual risk-taking behaviors may not always align, supporting dual-process theories.
  • Feedback, particularly emotionally salient feedback, is an effective tool for modulating risk sensitivity and reducing risky driving.
  • Findings offer insights for designing targeted interventions to improve road safety.