Related Experiment Videos
Haemorrhage in pancreatic disease
1Department of Surgical Studies, Middlesex Hospital, London, UK.
The British Journal of Surgery
|August 1, 1989
Summary
Hemorrhage in pancreatic disease is dangerous. Pancreatic resection is recommended for major bleeding with sepsis or fistula, while ligation is suitable for post-resection bleeding without complications.
Area of Science:
- Gastroenterology
- Surgical Oncology
- Hepatobiliary Surgery
Background:
- Hemorrhage is a severe complication in pancreatic disease.
- It can be life-threatening, arising either spontaneously or post-pancreatic resection.
Purpose of the Study:
- To describe the management and outcomes of patients experiencing hemorrhage related to pancreatic disease.
- To identify factors influencing treatment decisions and patient prognosis.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective review of 25 patients with pancreatic hemorrhage.
- Analysis of bleeding severity (major vs. minor), origin (spontaneous vs. post-resection), and management strategies.
- Evaluation of outcomes including mortality, sepsis, and respiratory failure.
Main Results:
- Fifteen patients had major bleeding (6 spontaneous, 9 post-resection); 9 had minor bleeding; 1 had a pseudoaneurysm.
- Spontaneous major bleeding had a high mortality (1/6 resection, 1/1 conservative).
- Post-resection major bleeding managed by ligation had 1 death; conservative management had 1 death; rebleeding required resection.
- Minor hemorrhages were managed conservatively with no mortality.
- Deaths were attributed to sepsis and respiratory failure.
- Underlying factors included severe pancreatitis, pseudocysts, and pancreatic fistulae.
Conclusions:
- Pancreatic resection is advised for hemorrhage with sepsis, pancreatic fistula, or severe pancreatitis.
- Ligation is a viable option for post-resection bleeding in the absence of these complications.
- Early identification and appropriate management are crucial for improving outcomes in pancreatic hemorrhage.