Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 14, 2026

08:25
Radiation Planning Assistant - A Streamlined, Fully Automated Radiotherapy Treatment Planning System
Published on: April 11, 2018
16.1K
Initial clinical experience with ArcCHECK for IMRT/VMAT QA.
Michalis Aristophanous1, Yelin Suh, Pai C Chi
1The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center. maristophanous@mdanderson.org.
Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics
|September 30, 2016
Summary
This study evaluated the ArcCHECK device for patient-specific IMRT/VMAT quality assurance (QA). While generally performing well, field size variations impact accuracy, necessitating further calibration for improved QA sensitivity.
Area of Science:
- Medical Physics
- Radiation Oncology
- Radiotherapy QA
Background:
- Patient-specific quality assurance (QA) is crucial for Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy (IMRT) and Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy (VMAT).
- Commercially available devices aim to streamline and improve the accuracy of this QA process.
Purpose of the Study:
- To report on the clinical experience and initial results using the ArcCHECK device for patient-specific IMRT/VMAT QA.
- To assess the stability, performance, and clinical outcomes of the ArcCHECK device over one year of routine use.
Main Methods:
- Commissioning tests included uniformity, linearity, and repetition rate dependence.
- Clinical data from 3,116 patient-specific IMRT/VMAT QA cases were analyzed.
- Gamma pass rates (3%/3 mm) were evaluated across various factors including treatment site, technique, MLCs, and linear accelerator (LINAC) models.
Main Results:
- Commissioning tests showed expected performance with 1% standard deviation in uniformity and linear dose response.
- Overall, 4.5% of cases failed the 90% pass rate criterion.
- Statistically significant differences in pass rates were observed based on treatment site, MLC type, and LINAC model, largely attributed to field size dependence.
Conclusions:
- The ArcCHECK device demonstrates acceptable performance for routine IMRT/VMAT QA, consistent with AAPM TG-119 recommendations.
- Observed variations in QA pass rates, particularly related to field size, require further investigation and potential correction to enhance device specificity and sensitivity.

