Jove
Visualize
Contact Us

Related Concept Videos

Friedman Two-way Analysis of Variance by Ranks01:21

Friedman Two-way Analysis of Variance by Ranks

535
Friedman's Two-Way Analysis of Variance by Ranks is a nonparametric test designed to identify differences across multiple test attempts when traditional assumptions of normality and equal variances do not apply. Unlike conventional ANOVA, which requires normally distributed data with equal variances, Friedman's test is ideal for ordinal or non-normally distributed data, making it particularly useful for analyzing dependent samples, such as matched subjects over time or repeated measures...
535
One-Way ANOVA: Equal Sample Sizes01:15

One-Way ANOVA: Equal Sample Sizes

4.3K
One-Way ANOVA can be performed on three or more samples with equal or unequal sample sizes. When one-way ANOVA is performed on two datasets with samples of equal sizes, it can be easily observed that the computed F statistic is highly sensitive to the sample mean.
Different sample means can result in different values for the variance estimate: variance between samples. This is because the variance between samples is calculated as the product of the sample size and the variance between the...
4.3K
Weighted Mean00:57

Weighted Mean

7.3K
While taking the arithmetic, geometric, or harmonic mean of a sample data set, equal importance is assigned to all the data points. However, all the values may not always be equally important in some data sets. An intrinsic bias might make it more important to give more weightage to specific values over others.
For example, consider the number of goals scored in the matches of a tournament. While computing the average number of goals scored in the tournament, it may be more important to...
7.3K
Bias01:22

Bias

7.9K
Bias refers to any tendency that prevents a question from being considered unprejudiced. In research, bias occurs when one outcome or answer is selected or encouraged over others in sampling or testing. Bias can occur during any research phase, including study design, data collection, analysis, and publication.
In statistics, a sampling bias is created when a sample is collected from a population, and some members of the population are not as likely to be chosen as others (remember, each member...
7.9K
One-Way ANOVA: Unequal Sample Sizes01:15

One-Way ANOVA: Unequal Sample Sizes

6.9K
One-way ANOVA can be performed on three or more samples of unequal sizes. However, calculations get complicated when sample sizes are not always the same. So, while performing ANOVA with unequal samples size, the following equation is used:
6.9K
Equity Theory01:26

Equity Theory

358
Equity theory explains how our sense of fairness influences the dynamics of close relationships. Rooted in social psychology, the theory posits that individuals evaluate fairness by comparing the ratio of their contributions to the rewards they receive. Relationship satisfaction is highest when these ratios are perceived as balanced between partners, promoting mutual reciprocity and a sense of justice.Equity vs. Equality in RelationshipsEquity is distinct from equality. Fairness does not...
358

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Numeric and verbal eyewitness confidence: order effects.

Memory (Hove, England)·2026
Same author

Does Eyewitness Confidence Calibration Vary by Target Race?

Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland)·2026
Same author

Working memory capacity is related to eyewitness identification accuracy, but selective attention and need for cognition are not.

Memory (Hove, England)·2025
Same author

Creating a cross-race effect inventory to postdict eyewitness accuracy.

Law and human behavior·2025
Same author

An examination of the cognitive processes related to eyewitness lineup decisions.

Memory (Hove, England)·2025
Same author

The Impact of Minority-Race Status on the Cross-Race Effect: A Critical Review.

Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science·2025
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Mar 14, 2026

Foreign Accent and Forensic Speaker Identification in Voice Lineups: The Influence of Acoustic Features Based on Prosody
09:09

Foreign Accent and Forensic Speaker Identification in Voice Lineups: The Influence of Acoustic Features Based on Prosody

Published on: September 27, 2024

956

Evaluating lineup fairness: Variations across methods and measures.

Jamal K Mansour1, Jennifer L Beaudry2, Natalie Kalmet3

  • 1Memory Research Group, Centre for Applied Social Sciences, Psychology & Sociology, Queen Margaret University.

Law and Human Behavior
|September 30, 2016
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Lineup fairness measures vary with mock-witness task methods. Individual witness descriptions inflate perceived lineup fairness but increase suspect bias, a critical issue for legal proceedings.

More Related Videos

A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments
08:12

A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments

Published on: March 1, 2022

3.0K
Holistic Facial Composite Creation and Subsequent Video Line-up Eyewitness Identification Paradigm
09:49

Holistic Facial Composite Creation and Subsequent Video Line-up Eyewitness Identification Paradigm

Published on: December 24, 2015

14.7K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Mar 14, 2026

Foreign Accent and Forensic Speaker Identification in Voice Lineups: The Influence of Acoustic Features Based on Prosody
09:09

Foreign Accent and Forensic Speaker Identification in Voice Lineups: The Influence of Acoustic Features Based on Prosody

Published on: September 27, 2024

956
A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments
08:12

A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments

Published on: March 1, 2022

3.0K
Holistic Facial Composite Creation and Subsequent Video Line-up Eyewitness Identification Paradigm
09:49

Holistic Facial Composite Creation and Subsequent Video Line-up Eyewitness Identification Paradigm

Published on: December 24, 2015

14.7K

Area of Science:

  • Psychology
  • Forensic Science
  • Criminal Justice

Background:

  • Lineup fairness is crucial for evaluating identification procedures and research consistency.
  • Empirical attention to lineup fairness measures and mock-witness tasks is limited and inconsistently reported.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate how lineup fairness measures are affected by mock-witness task methodologies.
  • To explore the validity and reliability of different lineup fairness measures.

Main Methods:

  • A large-scale online experiment with 1,010 participants.
  • Comparison of lineup fairness measures using individual versus aggregated witness descriptions in mock-witness tasks.

Main Results:

  • Individual descriptions led to higher perceived plausible lineup members but increased suspect bias compared to aggregated descriptions.
  • Target-absent lineups were rated fairer than target-present lineups, potentially masking bias against innocent suspects.
  • Measures showed convergent and discriminant validity, but reliability varied across descriptions and mock witnesses.

Conclusions:

  • Mock-witness task methodology significantly impacts lineup fairness perceptions.
  • Current fairness measures may inaccurately suggest that lineups with innocent suspects are less biased.
  • Standardized reporting of description type, detail, and lineup conditions is essential for future research.